From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>,
<srk@ti.com>, <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: keystone: Don't enable BAR0 if link is not detected
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:33:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5613f8e1-9c73-18c3-8a19-9a164b09b577@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012164336.GA1072823@bhelgaas>
On 12/10/23 22:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:15:09AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Hello Bjorn,
>>
>> Thank you for reviewing the patch.
>>
>> On 11/10/23 19:16, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>>
...
>> msix_prepare_msi_desc
>> In this function: msix_prepare_msi_desc, the following readl()
>> causes completion timeout:
>> desc->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
>> The completion timeout with the readl is only observed when the link
>> is down (No Endpoint device is actually connected to the PCIe
>> connector slot).
>
> Do you know the address ("addr")? From pci_msix_desc_addr(), it looks
> like it should be:
>
> desc->pci.mask_base + desc->msi_index * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE
>
> and desc->pci.mask_base should be dev->msix_base, which we got from
> msix_map_region(), which ioremaps part of the BAR indicated by the
> MSI-X Table Offset/Table BIR register.
>
> I wonder if this readl() is being handled as an MMIO access to a
> downstream device instead of a Root Port BAR access because it's
> inside the Root Port's MMIO window.
>
> Could you dump out these values just before the readl()?
>
> phys_addr inside msix_map_region()
> dev->msix_base
> desc->pci.mask_base
> desc->msi_index
> addr
phys_addr: 0x10102000
msix_base: 0xffff80000997a000
mask_base: 0xffff80000997a000
msi_index: 0
addr: 0xffff80000997a000
Also, the details of BAR allocation from the logs are:
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: host bridge /bus@100000/pcie@5500000 ranges:
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: IO 0x0010020000..0x001002ffff -> 0x0000000000
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: MEM 0x0010030000..0x0017ffffff -> 0x0010030000
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU unroll: enabled
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU regions: 8 ob, 8 ib, align 64K, limit 4G
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: Phy link never came up
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0xffff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x10030000-0x17ffffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: [104c:b00c] type 01 class 0x060400
pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x05500000-0x055fffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref]
pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x10100000-0x101fffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x10030000-0x1003ffff pref]
pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-ff]
The value of phys_addr lies within the range allocated to BAR0.
> call early_dump_pci_device() on the Root Port
I invoked early_dump_pci_device() within the pci_setup_device() function in
drivers/pci/probe.c and the output is:
pci 0000:00:00.0: config space:
00000000: 4c 10 0c b0 07 01 10 00 01 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
00000010: 00 00 50 05 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 00 00 00 00
00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 01 00 00
00000040: 01 50 c3 5b 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000050: 05 70 80 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 10 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00
00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 00 00 01 00
00000090: 00 00 00 00 1f 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00
000000a0: 02 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000b0: 11 00 00 01 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
> Bjorn
--
Regards,
Siddharth.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>,
<srk@ti.com>, <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: keystone: Don't enable BAR0 if link is not detected
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:33:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5613f8e1-9c73-18c3-8a19-9a164b09b577@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012164336.GA1072823@bhelgaas>
On 12/10/23 22:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:15:09AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Hello Bjorn,
>>
>> Thank you for reviewing the patch.
>>
>> On 11/10/23 19:16, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>>
...
>> msix_prepare_msi_desc
>> In this function: msix_prepare_msi_desc, the following readl()
>> causes completion timeout:
>> desc->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
>> The completion timeout with the readl is only observed when the link
>> is down (No Endpoint device is actually connected to the PCIe
>> connector slot).
>
> Do you know the address ("addr")? From pci_msix_desc_addr(), it looks
> like it should be:
>
> desc->pci.mask_base + desc->msi_index * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE
>
> and desc->pci.mask_base should be dev->msix_base, which we got from
> msix_map_region(), which ioremaps part of the BAR indicated by the
> MSI-X Table Offset/Table BIR register.
>
> I wonder if this readl() is being handled as an MMIO access to a
> downstream device instead of a Root Port BAR access because it's
> inside the Root Port's MMIO window.
>
> Could you dump out these values just before the readl()?
>
> phys_addr inside msix_map_region()
> dev->msix_base
> desc->pci.mask_base
> desc->msi_index
> addr
phys_addr: 0x10102000
msix_base: 0xffff80000997a000
mask_base: 0xffff80000997a000
msi_index: 0
addr: 0xffff80000997a000
Also, the details of BAR allocation from the logs are:
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: host bridge /bus@100000/pcie@5500000 ranges:
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: IO 0x0010020000..0x001002ffff -> 0x0000000000
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: MEM 0x0010030000..0x0017ffffff -> 0x0010030000
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU unroll: enabled
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU regions: 8 ob, 8 ib, align 64K, limit 4G
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: Phy link never came up
keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0xffff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x10030000-0x17ffffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: [104c:b00c] type 01 class 0x060400
pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x05500000-0x055fffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref]
pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x10100000-0x101fffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x10030000-0x1003ffff pref]
pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-ff]
The value of phys_addr lies within the range allocated to BAR0.
> call early_dump_pci_device() on the Root Port
I invoked early_dump_pci_device() within the pci_setup_device() function in
drivers/pci/probe.c and the output is:
pci 0000:00:00.0: config space:
00000000: 4c 10 0c b0 07 01 10 00 01 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
00000010: 00 00 50 05 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 00 00 00 00
00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 01 00 00
00000040: 01 50 c3 5b 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000050: 05 70 80 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 10 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00
00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 00 00 01 00
00000090: 00 00 00 00 1f 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00
000000a0: 02 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000b0: 11 00 00 01 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
> Bjorn
--
Regards,
Siddharth.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-13 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 12:34 [PATCH] PCI: keystone: Don't enable BAR0 if link is not detected Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-11 12:34 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-11 13:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 13:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-12 4:45 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-12 4:45 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-12 16:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-12 16:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-13 5:03 ` Siddharth Vadapalli [this message]
2023-10-13 5:03 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-13 5:06 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-13 5:06 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-13 18:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-13 18:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-14 5:52 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-14 5:52 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-16 21:29 ` Serge Semin
2023-10-16 21:29 ` Serge Semin
2023-10-17 4:14 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-17 4:14 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-18 10:42 ` Serge Semin
2023-10-18 10:42 ` Serge Semin
2023-10-18 10:49 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2023-10-18 10:49 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5613f8e1-9c73-18c3-8a19-9a164b09b577@ti.com \
--to=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=r-gunasekaran@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.