From: Weidong Wang <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <sony.chacko@qlogic.com>, <Dept-HSGLinuxNICDev@qlogic.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<rui.xiang@huawei.com>, <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] BNX2: fix a Null Pointer for stats_blk
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:03:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56163F83.1000901@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150929.211011.677113057504126372.davem@davemloft.net>
we have two processes to do:
P1#: ifconfig eth0 down; which will call bnx2_close, then will
, and set Null to stats_blk
P2#: ifconfig eth0; which will call bnx2_get_stats64, it will
use stats_blk.
In one case:
--P1#-- --P2#--
stats_blk(no null)
bnx2_free_mem
->bp->stats_blk = NULL
GET_64BIT_NET_STATS
then it will cause 'NULL Pointer' Problem.
it is as well with 'ethtool -S ethx'.
Allocate the statistics block at probe time so that this problem is
impossible
Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
---
Change in v2:
- Use Allocate the statistics block instead of spinlock, which
suggested by David Miller.
- Updating commit message according to changes.
Change in v3:
- bnx2_alloc_stats_blk is just allocating the stats block.
- use 'bp->status_blk' to store the status_blk which would used
in other funcs, just to key the codes simplified.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
index 2b66ef3..6259064 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
@@ -813,6 +813,46 @@ bnx2_alloc_rx_mem(struct bnx2 *bp)
}
static void
+bnx2_free_stats_blk(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct bnx2 *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+ if (bp->status_blk) {
+ dma_free_coherent(&bp->pdev->dev, bp->status_stats_size,
+ bp->status_blk,
+ bp->status_blk_mapping);
+ bp->status_blk = NULL;
+ bp->stats_blk = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
+static int
+bnx2_alloc_stats_blk(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ int status_blk_size;
+ void *status_blk;
+ struct bnx2 *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+ /* Combine status and statistics blocks into one allocation. */
+ status_blk_size = L1_CACHE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct status_block));
+ if (bp->flags & BNX2_FLAG_MSIX_CAP)
+ status_blk_size = L1_CACHE_ALIGN(BNX2_MAX_MSIX_HW_VEC *
+ BNX2_SBLK_MSIX_ALIGN_SIZE);
+ bp->status_stats_size = status_blk_size +
+ sizeof(struct statistics_block);
+ status_blk = dma_zalloc_coherent(&bp->pdev->dev, bp->status_stats_size,
+ &bp->status_blk_mapping, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (status_blk == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ bp->status_blk = status_blk;
+ bp->stats_blk = status_blk + status_blk_size;
+ bp->stats_blk_mapping = bp->status_blk_mapping + status_blk_size;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void
bnx2_free_mem(struct bnx2 *bp)
{
int i;
@@ -829,37 +869,19 @@ bnx2_free_mem(struct bnx2 *bp)
bp->ctx_blk[i] = NULL;
}
}
- if (bnapi->status_blk.msi) {
- dma_free_coherent(&bp->pdev->dev, bp->status_stats_size,
- bnapi->status_blk.msi,
- bp->status_blk_mapping);
+
+ if (bnapi->status_blk.msi)
bnapi->status_blk.msi = NULL;
- bp->stats_blk = NULL;
- }
}
static int
bnx2_alloc_mem(struct bnx2 *bp)
{
- int i, status_blk_size, err;
+ int i, err;
struct bnx2_napi *bnapi;
- void *status_blk;
-
- /* Combine status and statistics blocks into one allocation. */
- status_blk_size = L1_CACHE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct status_block));
- if (bp->flags & BNX2_FLAG_MSIX_CAP)
- status_blk_size = L1_CACHE_ALIGN(BNX2_MAX_MSIX_HW_VEC *
- BNX2_SBLK_MSIX_ALIGN_SIZE);
- bp->status_stats_size = status_blk_size +
- sizeof(struct statistics_block);
-
- status_blk = dma_zalloc_coherent(&bp->pdev->dev, bp->status_stats_size,
- &bp->status_blk_mapping, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (status_blk == NULL)
- goto alloc_mem_err;
bnapi = &bp->bnx2_napi[0];
- bnapi->status_blk.msi = status_blk;
+ bnapi->status_blk.msi = bp->status_blk;
bnapi->hw_tx_cons_ptr =
&bnapi->status_blk.msi->status_tx_quick_consumer_index0;
bnapi->hw_rx_cons_ptr =
@@ -870,7 +892,7 @@ bnx2_alloc_mem(struct bnx2 *bp)
bnapi = &bp->bnx2_napi[i];
- sblk = (status_blk + BNX2_SBLK_MSIX_ALIGN_SIZE * i);
+ sblk = (bp->status_blk + BNX2_SBLK_MSIX_ALIGN_SIZE * i);
bnapi->status_blk.msix = sblk;
bnapi->hw_tx_cons_ptr =
&sblk->status_tx_quick_consumer_index;
@@ -880,10 +902,6 @@ bnx2_alloc_mem(struct bnx2 *bp)
}
}
- bp->stats_blk = status_blk + status_blk_size;
-
- bp->stats_blk_mapping = bp->status_blk_mapping + status_blk_size;
-
if (BNX2_CHIP(bp) == BNX2_CHIP_5709) {
bp->ctx_pages = 0x2000 / BNX2_PAGE_SIZE;
if (bp->ctx_pages == 0)
@@ -8330,6 +8348,11 @@ bnx2_init_board(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct net_device *dev)
bp->phy_addr = 1;
+ /* allocate stats_blk */
+ rc = bnx2_alloc_stats_blk(dev);
+ if (rc)
+ goto err_out_unmap;
+
/* Disable WOL support if we are running on a SERDES chip. */
if (BNX2_CHIP(bp) == BNX2_CHIP_5709)
bnx2_get_5709_media(bp);
@@ -8586,6 +8609,7 @@ error:
pci_release_regions(pdev);
pci_disable_device(pdev);
err_free:
+ bnx2_free_stats_blk(dev);
free_netdev(dev);
return rc;
}
@@ -8603,6 +8627,7 @@ bnx2_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pci_iounmap(bp->pdev, bp->regview);
+ bnx2_free_stats_blk(dev);
kfree(bp->temp_stats_blk);
if (bp->flags & BNX2_FLAG_AER_ENABLED) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.h
index f92f76c..380234d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.h
@@ -6928,6 +6928,7 @@ struct bnx2 {
dma_addr_t status_blk_mapping;
+ void *status_blk;
struct statistics_block *stats_blk;
struct statistics_block *temp_stats_blk;
dma_addr_t stats_blk_mapping;
--
1.9.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 12:42 [PATCH net-next] BNX2: fix a Null Pointer for stats_blk Weidong Wang
2015-09-23 22:31 ` David Miller
2015-09-24 2:00 ` Weidong Wang
2015-09-24 5:34 ` David Miller
2015-09-24 6:53 ` Weidong Wang
2015-09-28 7:01 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Weidong Wang
2015-09-29 3:15 ` Weidong Wang
2015-09-29 3:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 RESEND] " Weidong Wang
2015-09-30 4:10 ` David Miller
2015-10-08 10:03 ` Weidong Wang [this message]
2015-10-11 12:07 ` [PATCH net-next v3] " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56163F83.1000901@huawei.com \
--to=wangweidong1@huawei.com \
--cc=Dept-HSGLinuxNICDev@qlogic.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manish.chopra@qlogic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
--cc=sony.chacko@qlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.