From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: Drop parent field from struct acpi_device
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:54:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5617470.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0cab176-3c3a-707a-02c3-74ffc1b4926e@huawei.com>
On Saturday, August 27, 2022 3:19:33 PM CEST Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 2022/8/25 0:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -365,7 +365,6 @@ struct acpi_device {
> > int device_type;
> > acpi_handle handle; /* no handle for fixed hardware */
> > struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
> > - struct acpi_device *parent;
> > struct list_head wakeup_list;
> > struct list_head del_list;
> > struct acpi_device_status status;
> > @@ -458,6 +457,14 @@ static inline void *acpi_driver_data(str
> > #define to_acpi_device(d) container_of(d, struct acpi_device, dev)
> > #define to_acpi_driver(d) container_of(d, struct acpi_driver, drv)
> >
> > +static inline struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_parent(struct acpi_device *adev)
> > +{
> > + if (adev->dev.parent)
> > + return to_acpi_device(adev->dev.parent);
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void acpi_set_device_status(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 sta)
> > {
> > *((u32 *)&adev->status) = sta;
> > @@ -478,6 +485,7 @@ void acpi_initialize_hp_context(struct a
> > /* acpi_device.dev.bus == &acpi_bus_type */
> > extern struct bus_type acpi_bus_type;
> >
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_parent(struct acpi_device *adev);
>
> We have a static inline function above, is it duplicated here?
> Or did I miss some use cases?
No, you didn't, it is redundant.
I've just sent a fix for this.
Thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: Drop parent field from struct acpi_device
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:54:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5617470.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0cab176-3c3a-707a-02c3-74ffc1b4926e@huawei.com>
On Saturday, August 27, 2022 3:19:33 PM CEST Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 2022/8/25 0:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -365,7 +365,6 @@ struct acpi_device {
> > int device_type;
> > acpi_handle handle; /* no handle for fixed hardware */
> > struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
> > - struct acpi_device *parent;
> > struct list_head wakeup_list;
> > struct list_head del_list;
> > struct acpi_device_status status;
> > @@ -458,6 +457,14 @@ static inline void *acpi_driver_data(str
> > #define to_acpi_device(d) container_of(d, struct acpi_device, dev)
> > #define to_acpi_driver(d) container_of(d, struct acpi_driver, drv)
> >
> > +static inline struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_parent(struct acpi_device *adev)
> > +{
> > + if (adev->dev.parent)
> > + return to_acpi_device(adev->dev.parent);
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void acpi_set_device_status(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 sta)
> > {
> > *((u32 *)&adev->status) = sta;
> > @@ -478,6 +485,7 @@ void acpi_initialize_hp_context(struct a
> > /* acpi_device.dev.bus == &acpi_bus_type */
> > extern struct bus_type acpi_bus_type;
> >
> > +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_parent(struct acpi_device *adev);
>
> We have a static inline function above, is it duplicated here?
> Or did I miss some use cases?
No, you didn't, it is redundant.
I've just sent a fix for this.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 16:11 [PATCH v1 0/5] ACPI: Device enumeration rearrangements and parent field elimination Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] ACPI: Rename acpi_bus_get/put_acpi_device() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-10 16:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-08-10 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] ACPI: scan: Rename acpi_bus_get_parent() and rearrange it Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-12 13:08 ` Punit Agrawal
2022-08-10 16:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] ACPI: scan: Rearrange initialization of ACPI device objects Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] ACPI: scan: Eliminate __acpi_device_add() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-10 16:23 ` [PATCH v1 5/5][RFT] ACPI: Drop parent field from struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-10 16:33 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-10 17:10 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-08-12 15:14 ` Wei Liu
2022-08-24 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-24 16:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-24 18:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-24 18:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-24 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-24 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-27 13:19 ` Hanjun Guo
2022-08-27 13:19 ` Hanjun Guo
2022-08-29 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-08-29 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-30 21:29 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-08-30 21:29 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-08-12 13:11 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] ACPI: Device enumeration rearrangements and parent field elimination Punit Agrawal
2022-08-23 16:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-29 15:21 ` [PATCH v1] ACPI: PM: Fix NULL argument handling in acpi_device_get/set_power() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-29 15:53 ` [PATCH v1] ACPI: Drop redundant acpi_dev_parent() header Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-30 2:17 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5617470.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.