All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com>,
	Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com"
	<brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in brcmfmac driver
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:42:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5618C15F.2030706@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17EC94B0A072C34B8DCF0D30AD16044A02874785@BPXM09GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>

On 10/09/2015 02:35 AM, Kosuke Tatsukawa wrote:
> brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake() seems to be missing a memory barrier
> which might cause the waker to not notice the waiter and miss sending a
> wake_up as in the following figure.
> 
>    brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake		    brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wait
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> if (waitqueue_active(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait))
> /* The CPU might reorder the test for
>     the waitqueue up here, before
>     prior writes complete */
>     	   	     	 	       /* wait_event_timeout */
> 				        /* __wait_event_timeout */
> 					 /* ___wait_event */
> 					 prepare_to_wait_event(&wq, &__wait,
> 					   state);
> 					 if (msgbuf->ctl_completed)
> 					 ...
> msgbuf->ctl_completed = true;
> 					 schedule_timeout(__ret))
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are three other place in drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/
> which have similar code.  The attached patch removes the call to
> waitqueue_active() leaving just wake_up() behind.  This fixes the
> problem because the call to spin_lock_irqsave() in wake_up() will be an
> ACQUIRE operation.
> 
> I found this issue when I was looking through the linux source code
> for places calling waitqueue_active() before wake_up*(), but without
> preceding memory barriers, after sending a patch to fix a similar
> issue in drivers/tty/n_tty.c  (Details about the original issue can be
> found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/28/849).

I prefer to add proper barriers instead of removing waitqueue_active()
check. We will review your patch and submit it through our upstream process.

Regards,
Arend

> Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c |    3 +--
>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c   |    6 ++----
>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c    |    3 +--
>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> index 7b2136c..648151e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> @@ -473,8 +473,7 @@ static int brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wait(struct brcmf_msgbuf *msgbuf)
>   static void brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake(struct brcmf_msgbuf *msgbuf)
>   {
>   	msgbuf->ctl_completed = true;
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait))
> -		wake_up(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait);
> +	wake_up(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait);
>   }
>   
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index f990e3d..332c4c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_dcmd_resp_wait(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint *condition,
>   
>   static int brcmf_sdio_dcmd_resp_wake(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>   {
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait))
> -		wake_up_interruptible(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait);
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -2110,8 +2109,7 @@ static uint brcmf_sdio_readframes(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint maxframes)
>   static void
>   brcmf_sdio_wait_event_wakeup(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>   {
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&bus->ctrl_wait))
> -		wake_up_interruptible(&bus->ctrl_wait);
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&bus->ctrl_wait);
>   	return;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> index daba86d..7f5889c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> @@ -184,8 +184,7 @@ static int brcmf_usb_ioctl_resp_wait(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
>   
>   static void brcmf_usb_ioctl_resp_wake(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
>   {
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait))
> -		wake_up(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait);
> +	wake_up(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait);
>   }
>   
>   static void
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arend van Spriel <arend-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu-zZGIbrA41Td8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Brett Rudley <brudley-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin"
	<frankyl-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Hante Meuleman <meuleman-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Pieter-Paul Giesberts
	<pieterpg-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"John W. Linville"
	<linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Markus Elfring
	<elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"brcm80211-dev-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org"
	<brcm80211-dev-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in brcmfmac driver
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:42:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5618C15F.2030706@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17EC94B0A072C34B8DCF0D30AD16044A02874785-9lrffkYxhwTt6d3pZDjeaEtBU8KWyXPq@public.gmane.org>

On 10/09/2015 02:35 AM, Kosuke Tatsukawa wrote:
> brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake() seems to be missing a memory barrier
> which might cause the waker to not notice the waiter and miss sending a
> wake_up as in the following figure.
> 
>    brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake		    brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wait
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> if (waitqueue_active(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait))
> /* The CPU might reorder the test for
>     the waitqueue up here, before
>     prior writes complete */
>     	   	     	 	       /* wait_event_timeout */
> 				        /* __wait_event_timeout */
> 					 /* ___wait_event */
> 					 prepare_to_wait_event(&wq, &__wait,
> 					   state);
> 					 if (msgbuf->ctl_completed)
> 					 ...
> msgbuf->ctl_completed = true;
> 					 schedule_timeout(__ret))
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are three other place in drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/
> which have similar code.  The attached patch removes the call to
> waitqueue_active() leaving just wake_up() behind.  This fixes the
> problem because the call to spin_lock_irqsave() in wake_up() will be an
> ACQUIRE operation.
> 
> I found this issue when I was looking through the linux source code
> for places calling waitqueue_active() before wake_up*(), but without
> preceding memory barriers, after sending a patch to fix a similar
> issue in drivers/tty/n_tty.c  (Details about the original issue can be
> found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/28/849).

I prefer to add proper barriers instead of removing waitqueue_active()
check. We will review your patch and submit it through our upstream process.

Regards,
Arend

> Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu-zZGIbrA41Td8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c |    3 +--
>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c   |    6 ++----
>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c    |    3 +--
>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> index 7b2136c..648151e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/msgbuf.c
> @@ -473,8 +473,7 @@ static int brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wait(struct brcmf_msgbuf *msgbuf)
>   static void brcmf_msgbuf_ioctl_resp_wake(struct brcmf_msgbuf *msgbuf)
>   {
>   	msgbuf->ctl_completed = true;
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait))
> -		wake_up(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait);
> +	wake_up(&msgbuf->ioctl_resp_wait);
>   }
>   
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index f990e3d..332c4c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_dcmd_resp_wait(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint *condition,
>   
>   static int brcmf_sdio_dcmd_resp_wake(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>   {
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait))
> -		wake_up_interruptible(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait);
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&bus->dcmd_resp_wait);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -2110,8 +2109,7 @@ static uint brcmf_sdio_readframes(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint maxframes)
>   static void
>   brcmf_sdio_wait_event_wakeup(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>   {
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&bus->ctrl_wait))
> -		wake_up_interruptible(&bus->ctrl_wait);
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&bus->ctrl_wait);
>   	return;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> index daba86d..7f5889c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> @@ -184,8 +184,7 @@ static int brcmf_usb_ioctl_resp_wait(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
>   
>   static void brcmf_usb_ioctl_resp_wake(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
>   {
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait))
> -		wake_up(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait);
> +	wake_up(&devinfo->ioctl_resp_wait);
>   }
>   
>   static void
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-10  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-09  0:35 [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in brcmfmac driver Kosuke Tatsukawa
2015-10-09 19:44 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-10-10  7:42 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2015-10-10  7:42   ` Arend van Spriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5618C15F.2030706@broadcom.com \
    --to=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pieterpg@broadcom.com \
    --cc=tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.