From: axboe@fb.com (Jens Axboe)
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] blk-mq: use a delayed work item for timeouts
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:08:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561C1324.3030800@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561C0B3C.70004@fb.com>
On 10/12/2015 01:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 01:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> For some pending NVMe work I'd really love to be able to get my timeouts
>> from process context. So far it seems only SCSI and NVMe use the blk-mq
>> timeout handler, and both don't seem to be particularly excited about
>> being called from time context. Does anyone have an objection against
>> the patch below that switches it to use a delayed work item? I could
>> make use of this quickly for NVMe, but for SCSI we still have to deal
>> with the old request code which can't be switched to a delayed work
>> as easily.
>
> No that's definitely fine with me, imho most error handling callbacks
> should be in process context for ease of use in the driver.
Took a closer look. The patch looks incomplete. The hot path for blk-mq
is blk_add_timer(), looks like you left that one alone in the conversion?
Might be easier to just leave the timer alone, and if it actually fires
_and_ we have to do something, punt to a workqueue instead of invoking
the timeout handler directly.
--
Jens Axboe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: hare@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] blk-mq: use a delayed work item for timeouts
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:08:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561C1324.3030800@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561C0B3C.70004@fb.com>
On 10/12/2015 01:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 01:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> For some pending NVMe work I'd really love to be able to get my timeouts
>> from process context. So far it seems only SCSI and NVMe use the blk-mq
>> timeout handler, and both don't seem to be particularly excited about
>> being called from time context. Does anyone have an objection against
>> the patch below that switches it to use a delayed work item? I could
>> make use of this quickly for NVMe, but for SCSI we still have to deal
>> with the old request code which can't be switched to a delayed work
>> as easily.
>
> No that's definitely fine with me, imho most error handling callbacks
> should be in process context for ease of use in the driver.
Took a closer look. The patch looks incomplete. The hot path for blk-mq
is blk_add_timer(), looks like you left that one alone in the conversion?
Might be easier to just leave the timer alone, and if it actually fires
_and_ we have to do something, punt to a workqueue instead of invoking
the timeout handler directly.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 19:29 [PATCH, RFC] blk-mq: use a delayed work item for timeouts Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 19:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2015-10-12 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2015-10-12 20:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-10-12 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2015-10-12 20:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 20:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 20:26 ` Jens Axboe
2015-10-12 20:26 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561C1324.3030800@fb.com \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.