All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: julien.grall@citrix.com (Julien Grall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:32:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561ED80D.9020905@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444844997-27314-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>

Hi Stefano,

On 14/10/2015 18:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c |    6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index 6c09cc4..59f5421 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
>   	int err;
>   	int cpu = get_cpu();
>
> +	/* vcpu_info already registered, can happen with cpu-hotplug */

Can you please add more comment and explain in the commit message why 
this is necessary for cpu-hotplug?

I had to look at the x86 code to fully understand that it's not possible 
to call VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info twice because there is no hypercall to 
remove the vcpu shared page.


> +	if (per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) != NULL) {
> +		put_cpu();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
>   	vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
>
>

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:32:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561ED80D.9020905@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444844997-27314-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>

Hi Stefano,

On 14/10/2015 18:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c |    6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index 6c09cc4..59f5421 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
>   	int err;
>   	int cpu = get_cpu();
>
> +	/* vcpu_info already registered, can happen with cpu-hotplug */

Can you please add more comment and explain in the commit message why 
this is necessary for cpu-hotplug?

I had to look at the x86 code to fully understand that it's not possible 
to call VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info twice because there is no hypercall to 
remove the vcpu shared page.


> +	if (per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) != NULL) {
> +		put_cpu();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
>   	vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
>
>

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-14 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14 17:49 xen,arm: enable cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 17:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen/arm: Enable cpu_hotplug.c Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 17:49   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 18:05   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-10-14 18:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-10-14 18:17     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 18:17       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:21       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:21         ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 22:51   ` Julien Grall
2015-10-14 22:51     ` Julien Grall
2015-10-16 15:23     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:23       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen, cpu_hotplug: call device_offline instead of cpu_down Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 17:49   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 17:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: don't try to re-register vcpu_info on cpu_hotplug Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 17:49   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 22:32   ` Julien Grall [this message]
2015-10-14 22:32     ` Julien Grall
2015-10-16 15:31     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:31       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-14 23:23 ` xen,arm: enable cpu_hotplug Julien Grall
2015-10-14 23:23   ` Julien Grall
2015-10-15  8:39   ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2015-10-15  8:39     ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-15  9:57     ` Julien Grall
2015-10-15  9:57       ` Julien Grall
2015-10-15  9:58       ` Julien Grall
2015-10-15  9:58         ` Julien Grall
2015-10-16 15:44       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:44         ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:41     ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:41       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:45       ` Julien Grall
2015-10-16 15:45         ` Julien Grall
2015-10-16 15:45   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 15:45     ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561ED80D.9020905@citrix.com \
    --to=julien.grall@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.