All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:42:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561FC97D.2040806@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151015153116.GE26893@odux.rfo.atmel.com>

Le 15/10/2015 17:31, Ludovic Desroches a ?crit :
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>>> Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>> It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate
>> patch).
>>
> 
> Maybe I have to send a whole defconfig update . I mean when you do
> savedefconfig, you have more changes. I won't send each one separately. I
> have kept changes which were in relation with the stuff I had.
> 
> Or I can send a defconfig update from the savedefconfig and then add
> sama5d2, flexcom and sdhci.

Actually you can do this for our own AT91 defconfigs.

For the multi_v7_defconfig I would recommend to simply make a patch with
our updates and let the arm-soc maintainer merge it with their current
one: I mean, they will manage the conflicts on this file anyway and the
changes to this file will not be part of one or our pull-requests but a
patch that they will handle separately: so no need to add more update
than the strictly needed ones on our end.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:42:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561FC97D.2040806@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151015153116.GE26893@odux.rfo.atmel.com>

Le 15/10/2015 17:31, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>>> Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>> It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate
>> patch).
>>
> 
> Maybe I have to send a whole defconfig update . I mean when you do
> savedefconfig, you have more changes. I won't send each one separately. I
> have kept changes which were in relation with the stuff I had.
> 
> Or I can send a defconfig update from the savedefconfig and then add
> sama5d2, flexcom and sdhci.

Actually you can do this for our own AT91 defconfigs.

For the multi_v7_defconfig I would recommend to simply make a patch with
our updates and let the arm-soc maintainer merge it with their current
one: I mean, they will manage the conflicts on this file anyway and the
changes to this file will not be part of one or our pull-requests but a
patch that they will handle separately: so no need to add more update
than the strictly needed ones on our end.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:42:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561FC97D.2040806@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151015153116.GE26893@odux.rfo.atmel.com>

Le 15/10/2015 17:31, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>>> Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>> It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate
>> patch).
>>
> 
> Maybe I have to send a whole defconfig update . I mean when you do
> savedefconfig, you have more changes. I won't send each one separately. I
> have kept changes which were in relation with the stuff I had.
> 
> Or I can send a defconfig update from the savedefconfig and then add
> sama5d2, flexcom and sdhci.

Actually you can do this for our own AT91 defconfigs.

For the multi_v7_defconfig I would recommend to simply make a patch with
our updates and let the arm-soc maintainer merge it with their current
one: I mean, they will manage the conflicts on this file anyway and the
changes to this file will not be part of one or our pull-requests but a
patch that they will handle separately: so no need to add more update
than the strictly needed ones on our end.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14 12:11 [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d2: add missing devices Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d2 Xplained: add several devices Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-14 12:11   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-15 13:24   ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-10-15 13:24     ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-10-15 15:31     ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-15 15:31       ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-15 15:31       ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-15 15:42       ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-10-15 15:42         ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-10-15 15:42         ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-10-16  6:44         ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-16  6:44           ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-10-16  6:44           ` Ludovic Desroches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561FC97D.2040806@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.