From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kgene@kernel.org, k.kozlowski@samsung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:25:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5624DA21.80702@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5624D87D.4090901@osg.samsung.com>
Hi Javier,
On 10/19/2015 05:18 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Alim,
>
> On 10/19/2015 12:48 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE is currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the
>> smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a bigger RAM_DISK can
>> be used with defconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>> ---
>
> I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also
> not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable
> to me. So for this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>
Thanks
>> Every time I build exynos_defconfig, I need to manually change RAM_SIZE
>> to match my ramdisk image size. I am not sure what is the best ramdisk size
>> might be, but bumping it to 64K might be a reasonable one.
>>
>
> In case you are interested, I got some stats by doing grep on the ARM
> defconfigs using this [0]. Of course the sizes depends on the platform
> but just to have an idea about what sizes are more popular than others.
>
> SIZE COUNT
> 1024 17
> 8192 43
> 10240 1
> 16384 20
> 20000 25
> 32768 36
> 65536 15
>
This is informative.
> [0]: http://hastebin.com/buqukimede.bash
>
> Best regards,
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alim.akhtar@samsung.com (Alim Akhtar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:25:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5624DA21.80702@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5624D87D.4090901@osg.samsung.com>
Hi Javier,
On 10/19/2015 05:18 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Alim,
>
> On 10/19/2015 12:48 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE is currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the
>> smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a bigger RAM_DISK can
>> be used with defconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>> ---
>
> I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also
> not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable
> to me. So for this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>
Thanks
>> Every time I build exynos_defconfig, I need to manually change RAM_SIZE
>> to match my ramdisk image size. I am not sure what is the best ramdisk size
>> might be, but bumping it to 64K might be a reasonable one.
>>
>
> In case you are interested, I got some stats by doing grep on the ARM
> defconfigs using this [0]. Of course the sizes depends on the platform
> but just to have an idea about what sizes are more popular than others.
>
> SIZE COUNT
> 1024 17
> 8192 43
> 10240 1
> 16384 20
> 20000 25
> 32768 36
> 65536 15
>
This is informative.
> [0]: http://hastebin.com/buqukimede.bash
>
> Best regards,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 10:48 [RFC PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K Alim Akhtar
2015-10-19 10:48 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-19 11:48 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-19 11:48 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-19 11:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 11:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 11:53 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-19 11:53 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-19 12:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-19 12:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-19 11:55 ` Alim Akhtar [this message]
2015-10-19 11:55 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-19 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19 13:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-21 4:56 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-21 4:56 ` Alim Akhtar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5624DA21.80702@samsung.com \
--to=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.