From: "Anton.Glukhov" <anton.a.glukhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
hs-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
"Benoît Cousson"
<bcousson-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Anant Gole" <anantgole-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-can-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Wolfgang Grandegger"
<wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, can, ti_hecc: add DT support for the ti,hecc controller
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:38:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56265FDE.9050307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56265BC4.8080403-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
On 20.10.2015 18:20, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 05:18 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 10/20/2015 05:09 PM, Anton.Glukhov wrote:
>>>>> It's OMAP3 based arch, but HECC is implemented only in AM3505 and AM3517 SoCs.
>>>>> So, I'm confused about what's "name" should I use.
>>>>
>>>> Which SoC was available first? Pick that.
>>
>>> What do you mean available? I know only that HECC appear in AM3505 and AM3517. Nowhere else.
>>
>> Available on the market. Which one was produced first or was soldered
>> first to some PCB?
>
> A colleague just looked it up, a AM3517 is a AM3505 with 3d graphics. So
> pick AM3505.
Ok, thank you for help!
>
> Marc
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Anton.Glukhov" <anton.a.glukhov@gmail.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>, hs@denx.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Benoît Cousson" <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
"Anant Gole" <anantgole@ti.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@grandegger.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, can, ti_hecc: add DT support for the ti,hecc controller
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:38:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56265FDE.9050307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56265BC4.8080403@pengutronix.de>
On 20.10.2015 18:20, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 05:18 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 10/20/2015 05:09 PM, Anton.Glukhov wrote:
>>>>> It's OMAP3 based arch, but HECC is implemented only in AM3505 and AM3517 SoCs.
>>>>> So, I'm confused about what's "name" should I use.
>>>>
>>>> Which SoC was available first? Pick that.
>>
>>> What do you mean available? I know only that HECC appear in AM3505 and AM3517. Nowhere else.
>>
>> Available on the market. Which one was produced first or was soldered
>> first to some PCB?
>
> A colleague just looked it up, a AM3517 is a AM3505 with 3d graphics. So
> pick AM3505.
Ok, thank you for help!
>
> Marc
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 6:39 [PATCH] net, can, ti_hecc: add DT support for the ti,hecc controller Heiko Schocher
2015-10-19 6:58 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-10-19 7:27 ` Heiko Schocher
2015-10-19 7:31 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-10-20 14:57 ` Anton.Glukhov
2015-10-20 15:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-10-20 15:09 ` Anton.Glukhov
2015-10-20 15:18 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-10-20 15:20 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
[not found] ` <56265BC4.8080403-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-20 15:38 ` Anton.Glukhov [this message]
2015-10-20 15:38 ` Anton.Glukhov
2015-10-22 1:30 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56265FDE.9050307@gmail.com \
--to=anton.a.glukhov-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=anantgole-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bcousson-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hs-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-can-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.