* Does dt property name in a binding always need a vendor prefix?
@ 2015-10-21 15:05 Murali Karicheri
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Murali Karicheri @ 2015-10-21 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; +Cc: Kwok, WingMan
Experts,
I am looking for guidelines to name a DT property in a bindings. Do we
need to add a vendor specific prefix always or is it needed only
specific cases? I know the intent here is to avoid name space collision.
But by name space I assume, within a specific a device binding. For
example where device driver has a core framework that also uses DT
properties, any low level device driver using the framework needs to add
a vendor specific prefix to avoid collision. Is my understanding
correct? So standalone device drivers doesn't have to use prefix? Right?
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-10-21 15:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-21 15:05 Does dt property name in a binding always need a vendor prefix? Murali Karicheri
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.