All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	eric.auger@st.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] vfio: platform: move get/put reset at open/release
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:27:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628D624.3090004@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4122253.nUc0E0jzBg@wuerfel>

On 10/22/2015 02:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 13:40:16 Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 12:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 22 October 2015 11:42:02 Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> Currently reset lookup is done on probe. This introduces a
>>>> race with new registration mechanism in the case where the
>>>> vfio-platform driver is bound to the device before its module
>>>> is loaded: on the load, the probe happens which triggers the
>>>> reset module load which itself attempts to get the symbol for
>>>> the registration function (vfio_platform_register_reset). The
>>>> symbol is not yet available hence the lookup fails. In case we
>>>> do the lookup in the first open we are sure the vfio-platform
>>>> module is loaded and vfio_platform_register_reset is available.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> I don't understand the explanation. I would expect the request_module()
>>> call to block until the module is actually loaded. Is this not
>>> what happens?
>>
>> Again many thanks for this new review.
>>
>> My understanding is the following
>> 1) vfio-platform is attached to the device through the override mechanism
>> 2) vfio-platform get loaded through modprobe:
>> 2-1) the platform driver init function eventually calls the
>> vfio-platform probe function.
>> 2-2) request_module of vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac gets called.
>> 3) The init of  vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac looks for
>> vfio_platform_register_reset. Unfortunately at that stage the init of
>> vfio-platform is not completed so the symbol is not available
>> 3-1) in case symbol_get is used in vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac init, as
>> of today, this latter simply returns -EINVAL. Reset registration failed
>> but no stall.
>> 3-2) in case symbol_get is *not* used, I think the module loader
>> attempts to load vfio-platform, which is already under load and this
>> causes a stall.
>>
>> Let me know if you think this understanding is not correct.
> 
> I was expecting the vfio_platform_register_reset() function to be
> available by the time of step 2-2.
> 
> What I think is going on here is that we are still inside of the
> module_init() function of the vfio-platform driver at the time that
> we call the request_module(), and the symbols are not made visible
> to other modules until the module_init function returns with success.
> This is a side-effect of the probe function for the platform driver
> getting called from deep inside of the platform_driver_register()
> function for all devices that are already present.
yes we share the same understanding, this is what I meant.
> 
> I think it already works for the AMBA case, which uses separate modules,
> but we need to restructure the platform_device case slightly to do
> the same:

OK I will test the new module structure below and eventually remove the
symbol_get (I got the link issue). Thanks for the hint!

Eric
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> index 9ce8afe28450..a00a44814255 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
>  
> -vfio-platform-y := vfio_platform.o vfio_platform_common.o vfio_platform_irq.o
> +vfio-platform-base-y := vfio_platform_common.o vfio_platform_irq.o
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio-platform.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio_platform.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio-platform-base.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += reset/
>  
>  vfio-amba-y := vfio_amba.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += vfio-amba.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += vfio-platform-base.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += reset/
> 
> 
> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] vfio: platform: move get/put reset at open/release
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:27:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628D624.3090004@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4122253.nUc0E0jzBg@wuerfel>

On 10/22/2015 02:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 13:40:16 Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 12:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 22 October 2015 11:42:02 Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> Currently reset lookup is done on probe. This introduces a
>>>> race with new registration mechanism in the case where the
>>>> vfio-platform driver is bound to the device before its module
>>>> is loaded: on the load, the probe happens which triggers the
>>>> reset module load which itself attempts to get the symbol for
>>>> the registration function (vfio_platform_register_reset). The
>>>> symbol is not yet available hence the lookup fails. In case we
>>>> do the lookup in the first open we are sure the vfio-platform
>>>> module is loaded and vfio_platform_register_reset is available.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> I don't understand the explanation. I would expect the request_module()
>>> call to block until the module is actually loaded. Is this not
>>> what happens?
>>
>> Again many thanks for this new review.
>>
>> My understanding is the following
>> 1) vfio-platform is attached to the device through the override mechanism
>> 2) vfio-platform get loaded through modprobe:
>> 2-1) the platform driver init function eventually calls the
>> vfio-platform probe function.
>> 2-2) request_module of vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac gets called.
>> 3) The init of  vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac looks for
>> vfio_platform_register_reset. Unfortunately at that stage the init of
>> vfio-platform is not completed so the symbol is not available
>> 3-1) in case symbol_get is used in vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac init, as
>> of today, this latter simply returns -EINVAL. Reset registration failed
>> but no stall.
>> 3-2) in case symbol_get is *not* used, I think the module loader
>> attempts to load vfio-platform, which is already under load and this
>> causes a stall.
>>
>> Let me know if you think this understanding is not correct.
> 
> I was expecting the vfio_platform_register_reset() function to be
> available by the time of step 2-2.
> 
> What I think is going on here is that we are still inside of the
> module_init() function of the vfio-platform driver at the time that
> we call the request_module(), and the symbols are not made visible
> to other modules until the module_init function returns with success.
> This is a side-effect of the probe function for the platform driver
> getting called from deep inside of the platform_driver_register()
> function for all devices that are already present.
yes we share the same understanding, this is what I meant.
> 
> I think it already works for the AMBA case, which uses separate modules,
> but we need to restructure the platform_device case slightly to do
> the same:

OK I will test the new module structure below and eventually remove the
symbol_get (I got the link issue). Thanks for the hint!

Eric
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> index 9ce8afe28450..a00a44814255 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
>  
> -vfio-platform-y := vfio_platform.o vfio_platform_common.o vfio_platform_irq.o
> +vfio-platform-base-y := vfio_platform_common.o vfio_platform_irq.o
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio-platform.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio_platform.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio-platform-base.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += reset/
>  
>  vfio-amba-y := vfio_amba.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += vfio-amba.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += vfio-platform-base.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += reset/
> 
> 
> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: eric.auger@st.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	christoffer.dall@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] vfio: platform: move get/put reset at open/release
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:27:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628D624.3090004@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4122253.nUc0E0jzBg@wuerfel>

On 10/22/2015 02:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 13:40:16 Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 12:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 22 October 2015 11:42:02 Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> Currently reset lookup is done on probe. This introduces a
>>>> race with new registration mechanism in the case where the
>>>> vfio-platform driver is bound to the device before its module
>>>> is loaded: on the load, the probe happens which triggers the
>>>> reset module load which itself attempts to get the symbol for
>>>> the registration function (vfio_platform_register_reset). The
>>>> symbol is not yet available hence the lookup fails. In case we
>>>> do the lookup in the first open we are sure the vfio-platform
>>>> module is loaded and vfio_platform_register_reset is available.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> I don't understand the explanation. I would expect the request_module()
>>> call to block until the module is actually loaded. Is this not
>>> what happens?
>>
>> Again many thanks for this new review.
>>
>> My understanding is the following
>> 1) vfio-platform is attached to the device through the override mechanism
>> 2) vfio-platform get loaded through modprobe:
>> 2-1) the platform driver init function eventually calls the
>> vfio-platform probe function.
>> 2-2) request_module of vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac gets called.
>> 3) The init of  vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac looks for
>> vfio_platform_register_reset. Unfortunately at that stage the init of
>> vfio-platform is not completed so the symbol is not available
>> 3-1) in case symbol_get is used in vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac init, as
>> of today, this latter simply returns -EINVAL. Reset registration failed
>> but no stall.
>> 3-2) in case symbol_get is *not* used, I think the module loader
>> attempts to load vfio-platform, which is already under load and this
>> causes a stall.
>>
>> Let me know if you think this understanding is not correct.
> 
> I was expecting the vfio_platform_register_reset() function to be
> available by the time of step 2-2.
> 
> What I think is going on here is that we are still inside of the
> module_init() function of the vfio-platform driver at the time that
> we call the request_module(), and the symbols are not made visible
> to other modules until the module_init function returns with success.
> This is a side-effect of the probe function for the platform driver
> getting called from deep inside of the platform_driver_register()
> function for all devices that are already present.
yes we share the same understanding, this is what I meant.
> 
> I think it already works for the AMBA case, which uses separate modules,
> but we need to restructure the platform_device case slightly to do
> the same:

OK I will test the new module structure below and eventually remove the
symbol_get (I got the link issue). Thanks for the hint!

Eric
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> index 9ce8afe28450..a00a44814255 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile
> @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
>  
> -vfio-platform-y := vfio_platform.o vfio_platform_common.o vfio_platform_irq.o
> +vfio-platform-base-y := vfio_platform_common.o vfio_platform_irq.o
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio-platform.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio_platform.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += vfio-platform-base.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PLATFORM) += reset/
>  
>  vfio-amba-y := vfio_amba.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += vfio-amba.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += vfio-platform-base.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_AMBA) += reset/
> 
> 
> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-22 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-22  9:41 [PATCH v2 0/6] VFIO platform reset module rework Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41 ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] vfio: platform: add capability to register a reset function Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 10:06   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:06     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22  9:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] vfio: platform: reset: add vfio_platform_reset_private.h Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 10:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22  9:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] vfio: platform: reset: calxedaxgmac: add reset function registration Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:41   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 10:13   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:13     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 11:54     ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 11:54       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 11:54       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 12:09       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 12:09         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 12:29         ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 12:29           ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 12:29           ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] vfio: platform: add compat in vfio_platform_device Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] vfio: platform: use list of registered reset function Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 10:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 11:46     ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 11:46       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 11:46       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] vfio: platform: move get/put reset at open/release Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22  9:42   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 10:29   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 10:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 11:40     ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 11:40       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 12:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 12:05         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 12:27         ` Eric Auger [this message]
2015-10-22 12:27           ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 12:27           ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 13:26     ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 13:26       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 13:26       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 14:10       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 14:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 14:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 14:23         ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 14:23           ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 14:23           ` Eric Auger
2015-10-22 15:40           ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-22 15:40             ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-22 15:40             ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5628D624.3090004@linaro.org \
    --to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=eric.auger@st.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.