From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy mailbox device instantiation
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:11:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562918D7.6020202@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442273833-25013-2-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com>
Hi Tony,
On 09/14/2015 06:37 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> The legacy-style mailbox device creation is supported currently
> only for OMAP3, as all other SoCs are DT-boot only. Even on this
> SoC, there are no client drivers that utilize these mailbox devices.
> So, clean up the legacy-style mailbox device instantiation logic.
> The mailbox devices are already present and supported for the DT
> boot on OMAP3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 28 ----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
>
Ping, can you pick up this patch for your cleanup branch? FYI, Paul is
queueing Patch 2.
regards
Suman
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: s-anna@ti.com (Suman Anna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy mailbox device instantiation
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:11:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562918D7.6020202@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442273833-25013-2-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com>
Hi Tony,
On 09/14/2015 06:37 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> The legacy-style mailbox device creation is supported currently
> only for OMAP3, as all other SoCs are DT-boot only. Even on this
> SoC, there are no client drivers that utilize these mailbox devices.
> So, clean up the legacy-style mailbox device instantiation logic.
> The mailbox devices are already present and supported for the DT
> boot on OMAP3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 28 ----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
>
Ping, can you pick up this patch for your cleanup branch? FYI, Paul is
queueing Patch 2.
regards
Suman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 23:37 [PATCH 0/2] Cleanup legacy OMAP mailbox support Suman Anna
2015-09-14 23:37 ` Suman Anna
2015-09-14 23:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy mailbox device instantiation Suman Anna
2015-09-14 23:37 ` Suman Anna
2015-10-22 17:11 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2015-10-22 17:11 ` Suman Anna
2016-01-11 23:22 ` Suman Anna
2016-01-11 23:22 ` Suman Anna
2016-01-21 21:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-21 21:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-09-14 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod data: Remove legacy mailbox data and addrs Suman Anna
2015-09-14 23:37 ` Suman Anna
2015-10-22 16:44 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-10-22 16:44 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562918D7.6020202@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.