From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Caesar Wang
<caesar.upstream-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Caesar Wang <wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more compatible
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:04:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5634BC6F.6020408@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21587719.mnFBFBzBeI@phil>
On 10/31/2015 12:47 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> 在 2015年10月01日 03:14, Heiko Stübner 写道:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>>>>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>>>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
>>>>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Says:
>>>>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand
>>>>>> 1 --
>>>>>> `dsb`
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
>>>>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param
>>>>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and
>>>>>> dsb(sy)
>>>>>> are the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
>>>>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>>>> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them
>>>> to go
>>>> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right?
>>>
>>> I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-)
>>> In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:-
>>
>> Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go
>> through another tree.
>
> although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go
> through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second
> one is just cosmetics. The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case
> for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well?
Ok, I will take the two first patches through my tree.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more compatible
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:04:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5634BC6F.6020408@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21587719.mnFBFBzBeI@phil>
On 10/31/2015 12:47 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> ? 2015?10?01? 03:14, Heiko St?bner ??:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>>>>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>>>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
>>>>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Says:
>>>>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand
>>>>>> 1 --
>>>>>> `dsb`
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
>>>>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param
>>>>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and
>>>>>> dsb(sy)
>>>>>> are the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them
>>>> to go
>>>> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right?
>>>
>>> I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-)
>>> In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:-
>>
>> Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go
>> through another tree.
>
> although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go
> through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second
> one is just cosmetics. The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case
> for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well?
Ok, I will take the two first patches through my tree.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more compatible
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:04:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5634BC6F.6020408@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21587719.mnFBFBzBeI@phil>
On 10/31/2015 12:47 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> 在 2015年10月01日 03:14, Heiko Stübner 写道:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>>>>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>>>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
>>>>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Says:
>>>>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand
>>>>>> 1 --
>>>>>> `dsb`
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
>>>>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param
>>>>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and
>>>>>> dsb(sy)
>>>>>> are the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them
>>>> to go
>>>> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right?
>>>
>>> I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-)
>>> In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:-
>>
>> Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go
>> through another tree.
>
> although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go
> through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second
> one is just cosmetics. The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case
> for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well?
Ok, I will take the two first patches through my tree.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-31 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 2:14 [PATCH v2 0/4] Support the timer on RK3368 SoC Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more compatible Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-29 4:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 4:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-30 19:14 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-09-30 19:14 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-10-30 3:43 ` Caesar Wang
2015-10-30 3:43 ` Caesar Wang
2015-10-30 3:43 ` Caesar Wang
2015-10-30 10:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-10-30 10:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <56334995.6090103-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-30 23:47 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-30 23:47 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-30 23:47 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-10-31 13:04 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2015-10-31 13:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-10-31 13:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-11-02 17:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-11-02 17:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-11-02 17:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <56379D46.1000402-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-03 2:00 ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-03 2:00 ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-03 2:00 ` Caesar Wang
[not found] ` <56381547.5070109-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-03 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-11-03 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-11-03 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <56387110.4060805-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-03 9:59 ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-03 9:59 ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-03 9:59 ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] clocksource: rockchip: trivial: Make the driver more readability Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-29 4:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-29 4:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-25 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Enable the timer on Rockchip architecture Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` Caesar Wang
[not found] ` <1443147298-12603-4-git-send-email-wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-25 13:51 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-25 13:51 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-25 13:51 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-09-25 2:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add the needed timer for RK3368 SoC Caesar Wang
2015-09-25 2:14 ` Caesar Wang
2015-12-13 0:47 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-12-13 0:47 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5634BC6F.6020408@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=caesar.upstream-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.