All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com,
	amitdanielk@gmail.com,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:18:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563BF1C9.102@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563AE8C3.9000001@samsung.com>

On 05.11.2015 14:27, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Tuesday 03 November 2015 07:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26.10.2015 21:55, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>>> This patch series is a part of continuation work from following series
>>> [1] and [2].
>>>
>>> 1: exynos: Move pmu driver to driver/soc folder and add exynos7 support
>>>     http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39797.html from
>>> Amit Daniel Kacchap
>>> 2: soc: samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
>>>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/7/12 from me
>>>
>>
>> +Cc Bartlomiej,
>>
>> There were some concerns for previous versions of this patchset. I
>> cannot find all of them (e.g. Bartlomiej's are not present on lkml.org
>> anymore) so I am not sure if they were addressed properly.
>>
> 
> Yes. If I recall correctly he has following main concerns:
> 1: To convert exynos-pmu to a proper platform driver before moving out
> of arch/arm/mach-exynos. This is already addressed.
> 
> 2: Do we really need common driver for both ARM and ARM64? I feel yes,
> as at least I can see that driver's basic structure will be reused. As
> in case of PMU driver most of lines of code is data part (register
> offset and its values in different mode), that part will be kept in
> separate file e.g. exynos7-pmu.c or exynosXXXX-pmu.c.
> There has been already one attempt of submission for exynos7 PMU driver at:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/305418.html
> 
> 
> 3: He had a concern that in case of ARM64 build most of ARM related code
> will be present in binary which will be dead code, that can be addressed
> by excluding ARM based SoC exynosXXXX-pmu.c file in Makefile.
> It has been taken care in v3 7/7 patch in drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile.
> 

Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe someone will have other comments but for
me it's okay. When sending next version, please CC linux-pm mailing list
and arm-soc maintainers (Arnd, Olof, Kevin).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:18:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563BF1C9.102@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563AE8C3.9000001@samsung.com>

On 05.11.2015 14:27, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Tuesday 03 November 2015 07:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26.10.2015 21:55, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>>> This patch series is a part of continuation work from following series
>>> [1] and [2].
>>>
>>> 1: exynos: Move pmu driver to driver/soc folder and add exynos7 support
>>>     http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39797.html from
>>> Amit Daniel Kacchap
>>> 2: soc: samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
>>>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/7/12 from me
>>>
>>
>> +Cc Bartlomiej,
>>
>> There were some concerns for previous versions of this patchset. I
>> cannot find all of them (e.g. Bartlomiej's are not present on lkml.org
>> anymore) so I am not sure if they were addressed properly.
>>
> 
> Yes. If I recall correctly he has following main concerns:
> 1: To convert exynos-pmu to a proper platform driver before moving out
> of arch/arm/mach-exynos. This is already addressed.
> 
> 2: Do we really need common driver for both ARM and ARM64? I feel yes,
> as at least I can see that driver's basic structure will be reused. As
> in case of PMU driver most of lines of code is data part (register
> offset and its values in different mode), that part will be kept in
> separate file e.g. exynos7-pmu.c or exynosXXXX-pmu.c.
> There has been already one attempt of submission for exynos7 PMU driver at:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/305418.html
> 
> 
> 3: He had a concern that in case of ARM64 build most of ARM related code
> will be present in binary which will be dead code, that can be addressed
> by excluding ARM based SoC exynosXXXX-pmu.c file in Makefile.
> It has been taken care in v3 7/7 patch in drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile.
> 

Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe someone will have other comments but for
me it's okay. When sending next version, please CC linux-pm mailing list
and arm-soc maintainers (Arnd, Olof, Kevin).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-06  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-26 12:55 [PATCH v3 0/7] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: EXYNOS: removing redundant code from regs-pmu.h Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-03  1:37   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  1:37     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:27     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:27       ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Move pmu specific headers under "linux/soc/samsung" Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-03  1:46   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  1:46     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:28     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:28       ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ARCH: EXYNOS: split up exynos3250 SoC specific PMU data Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-03  1:55   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  1:55     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:31     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:31       ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-06  0:35       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-06  0:35         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] ARCH: EXYNOS: split up exynos4 " Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-03  1:56   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  1:56     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:33     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:33       ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ARCH: EXYNOS: split up exynos5250 " Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-03  2:07   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  2:07     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:31     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:31       ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] ARCH: EXYNOS: split up exynos5420 " Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-03  2:10   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  2:10     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:31     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:31       ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-26 12:55   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-03  2:22   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  2:22     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:31     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:31       ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-06  0:47       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-06  0:47         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  2:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-03  2:06   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-11-05  5:27   ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-05  5:27     ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-11-06  0:18     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-11-06  0:18       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=563BF1C9.102@samsung.com \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=amitdanielk@gmail.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.