* NIC with Erasure offload feature support and Ceph
@ 2015-11-03 11:15 Mike
2015-11-03 15:07 ` Gregory Farnum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike @ 2015-11-03 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ceph Development
Hello!
In our project we planing build a petabayte cluster with Erasure pool.
Also we looking on Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx EN Cards/ConnectX-4 EN Cards
for using its a offloading erasure code feature.
Someone use this feature in test lab/prodaction?
--
Mike, runs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC with Erasure offload feature support and Ceph
2015-11-03 11:15 NIC with Erasure offload feature support and Ceph Mike
@ 2015-11-03 15:07 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-11-10 8:28 ` Mike Almateia
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Farnum @ 2015-11-03 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike; +Cc: Ceph Development
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Mike <mike.almateia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In our project we planing build a petabayte cluster with Erasure pool.
> Also we looking on Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx EN Cards/ConnectX-4 EN Cards
> for using its a offloading erasure code feature.
>
> Someone use this feature in test lab/prodaction?
Nope. Ceph's erasure coding is very configurable (in terms of what
kind of EC it's doing) but the offload features in NICs that we've
seen aren't quite flexible enough for what Ceph is doing — it's an
unusual use case and set of requirements where these offload cards are
concerned. (We need to take an incoming stream, look at the raw
stream, then erasure code it into an unknown set of pieces, and then
send those pieces back out over the network to different addresses.)
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC with Erasure offload feature support and Ceph
2015-11-03 15:07 ` Gregory Farnum
@ 2015-11-10 8:28 ` Mike Almateia
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Almateia @ 2015-11-10 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gregory Farnum; +Cc: Ceph Development
03-Nov-15 18:07, Gregory Farnum пишет:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Mike <mike.almateia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> In our project we planing build a petabayte cluster with Erasure pool.
>> Also we looking on Mellanox ConnectX-4 Lx EN Cards/ConnectX-4 EN Cards
>> for using its a offloading erasure code feature.
>>
>> Someone use this feature in test lab/prodaction?
>
> Nope. Ceph's erasure coding is very configurable (in terms of what
> kind of EC it's doing) but the offload features in NICs that we've
> seen aren't quite flexible enough for what Ceph is doing — it's an
> unusual use case and set of requirements where these offload cards are
> concerned. (We need to take an incoming stream, look at the raw
> stream, then erasure code it into an unknown set of pieces, and then
> send those pieces back out over the network to different addresses.)
> -Greg
>
Thanks for reply.
Mellanox said that offload Erasure Code (RedSolomon algorithm) feature
support
on NICs will be released around April 2016.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-10 8:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-03 11:15 NIC with Erasure offload feature support and Ceph Mike
2015-11-03 15:07 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-11-10 8:28 ` Mike Almateia
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.