From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com>,
"quintela@redhat.com" <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: "amit.shah@redhat.com" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56445141.2070907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F2CBF3009FA73547804AE4C663CAB28E019A44B6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 12/11/2015 03:49, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> I am very surprised about the live migration performance result when
> I use your ' memeqzero4_paolo' instead of these SSE2 Intrinsics to
> check the zero pages.
What code were you using? Remember I suggested using only unsigned long
checks, like
unsigned long *p = ...
if (p[0] || p[1] || p[2] || p[3]
|| memcmp(p+4, p, size - 4 * sizeof(unsigned long)) != 0)
return BUFFER_NOT_ZERO;
else
return BUFFER_ZERO;
> The total live migration time increased about
> 8%! Not decreased. Although in the unit test your '
> memeqzero4_paolo' has better performance, any idea?
You only tested the case of zero pages. But real pages usually are not
zero, even if they have a few zero bytes at the beginning. It's very
important to optimize the initial check before the memcmp call.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 2:51 [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization Liang Li
2015-11-10 2:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [v2 1/2] cutils: " Liang Li
2015-11-12 10:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 10:12 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 11:30 ` Juan Quintela
2015-11-13 2:49 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-13 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 14:43 ` Richard Henderson
2015-11-10 2:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [v2 2/2] configure: add options to config avx2 Liang Li
2015-11-10 3:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization Eric Blake
2015-11-10 5:48 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 9:13 ` Juan Quintela
2015-11-10 9:26 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 9:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 9:41 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 9:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 9:56 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 10:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 10:04 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 2:49 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-11-12 8:53 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 9:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 9:40 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 9:53 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 11:34 ` Juan Quintela
2015-11-12 11:42 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 19:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-11-12 20:20 ` Eric Blake
2016-04-07 11:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-04-07 12:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-07 13:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-04-07 13:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56445141.2070907@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=liang.z.li@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.