From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Preview: vcpu lookup by id changes
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:38:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564D98AA.70909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447922251-54261-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On 19/11/2015 09:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> some more patches for review before I add them in my next pull request.
> Can you review the common code changes and Ack/Nack?
>
> Alex, Paul,
> can you review the power changes and Ack/Nack?
>
> As I want to have patch 2 in 4.4, I splitted up Davids patch into smaller
> chunks. David, can you double check that I did not mess up?
> So I want to send patch 1 and patch 2 for 4.4. Patch 3 and Patch 4
> are for kvm/next (4.5), but need patch 1 as well.
> So I will probably also add all patches into kvm/next by setting up
> the git branches in a way that during 4.5 merge window kvm/next will
> have my branch that will go via kvm/master as common ancestor.
>
> Ok?
Patches and plan both look good!
I can apply patch 1 and 2 now to kvm/master. By the time kvm/next forks
from Linus's tree (sometime next week, since kvm/queue is already
largish) they will be in.
Thanks,
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Preview: vcpu lookup by id changes
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:38:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564D98AA.70909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447922251-54261-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On 19/11/2015 09:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> some more patches for review before I add them in my next pull request.
> Can you review the common code changes and Ack/Nack?
>
> Alex, Paul,
> can you review the power changes and Ack/Nack?
>
> As I want to have patch 2 in 4.4, I splitted up Davids patch into smaller
> chunks. David, can you double check that I did not mess up?
> So I want to send patch 1 and patch 2 for 4.4. Patch 3 and Patch 4
> are for kvm/next (4.5), but need patch 1 as well.
> So I will probably also add all patches into kvm/next by setting up
> the git branches in a way that during 4.5 merge window kvm/next will
> have my branch that will go via kvm/master as common ancestor.
>
> Ok?
Patches and plan both look good!
I can apply patch 1 and 2 now to kvm/master. By the time kvm/next forks
from Linus's tree (sometime next week, since kvm/queue is already
largish) they will be in.
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-19 8:37 [PATCH 0/4] Preview: vcpu lookup by id changes Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: Provide function for VCPU lookup by id Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 12:11 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-19 12:11 ` Thomas Huth
2015-11-19 12:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-11-19 12:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-11-19 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-19 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-19 13:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 13:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 13:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-11-19 13:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-11-19 8:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: s390: fix wrong lookup of VCPUs by array index Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:52 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:52 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: use heuristic for fast VCPU lookup by id Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Use common function for " Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 8:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-11-19 9:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] Preview: vcpu lookup by id changes Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-19 9:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 9:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-19 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-19 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564D98AA.70909@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.