Re: Kernel 3.19 and still "disk full" even though 'btrfs fi df" reports enough room left?

[Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1304 bytes --]

On 2015-11-18 13:53, linux-btrfs.tebulin@xoxy.net wrote:
>
> P.S.: Just as user feedback: For /srv I'm using on the very same system
> ZFS since the very first day. With snapshots & all the fancy stuff like
> ZRAID-1, lz4, ... My number of Issues there: 0
Since other people have adequately answered the main questions, I'll 
just comment on this.

In general, ZFS is not a good comparison to BTRFS for anything but 
features.  Just the open source version of ZFS has been around for more 
than a decade, and it existed as proprietary code for quite a while 
before that.  As such, it's had a lot longer to stabilize, has had 
exponentially more testing, and in general is a lot more reliable.  As 
such, aside from feature comparisons, ZFS is going to win in almost all 
tests of performance, reliability, and usability for the foreseeable 
future.  This doesn't mean you shouldn't use BTRFS (ZFS got to where it 
is now exactly because _a lot_ of people use it), it just means you need 
to do a lot of homework, and ideally keep you system actually up to date 
(having all updates installed on Ubuntu doesn't really count in this 
case, they're pretty bad sometimes about not properly tracking upstream 
development (although they are significantly better than regular Debian)).


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3019 bytes --]