All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:44:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564E0A99.9020707@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5616576.CPP4uTUkOp@wuerfel>

Le 19/11/2015 16:22, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :
> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 12:35:58 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> This is the first "fixes" pull-request for AT91. I tried to collect little
>> patches that didn't make it for -rc1.
>> It can be due to synchronization between trees like the addition of some
>> sama5d2 Xplained nodes (MFD tree) or the change of the watchdog compatible
>> string for sama5d4 (watchdog tree).
>> It can also be due to trivial cleanups that were spotted or submitted late like
>> the replacement of "wakeup" properties or removal of unneeded defconfig option.
>> The removal of some dead legacy DT properties or nodes is, in my opinion worth
>> it as well in order to prevent us from abusive cut'n paste.
>> NAND and ISI Atmel MAINTAINERS entries are also updated.
>>
>> Tell me if it's okay for you.
> 
> I'd be happier to get the patches late in the process and then push back
> myself than to get them as fixes, there was really no reason to wait
> for the merge window to end with the ones that you already had.

I thought than having a precise milestone as a base for this
pull-request would be preferred.

> None of the changes look too invasive for -rc2, so I'm taking it anyway,
> but please try to let us know what you have earlier next time, so we
> can get the first fixes into the merge window, or add them as late
> additions on the branches before sending the main pull requests.
> 
> Inter-tree dependencies should never be a reason to send stuff after
> -rc1, let's talk about that before the merge window if you know you
> have those.

Sure, the communication in advance with you would have make all this
easier, sorry for not having done this.

Thanks Arnd. Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, <arm@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:44:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564E0A99.9020707@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5616576.CPP4uTUkOp@wuerfel>

Le 19/11/2015 16:22, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 12:35:58 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> This is the first "fixes" pull-request for AT91. I tried to collect little
>> patches that didn't make it for -rc1.
>> It can be due to synchronization between trees like the addition of some
>> sama5d2 Xplained nodes (MFD tree) or the change of the watchdog compatible
>> string for sama5d4 (watchdog tree).
>> It can also be due to trivial cleanups that were spotted or submitted late like
>> the replacement of "wakeup" properties or removal of unneeded defconfig option.
>> The removal of some dead legacy DT properties or nodes is, in my opinion worth
>> it as well in order to prevent us from abusive cut'n paste.
>> NAND and ISI Atmel MAINTAINERS entries are also updated.
>>
>> Tell me if it's okay for you.
> 
> I'd be happier to get the patches late in the process and then push back
> myself than to get them as fixes, there was really no reason to wait
> for the merge window to end with the ones that you already had.

I thought than having a precise milestone as a base for this
pull-request would be preferred.

> None of the changes look too invasive for -rc2, so I'm taking it anyway,
> but please try to let us know what you have earlier next time, so we
> can get the first fixes into the merge window, or add them as late
> additions on the branches before sending the main pull requests.
> 
> Inter-tree dependencies should never be a reason to send stuff after
> -rc1, let's talk about that before the merge window if you know you
> have those.

Sure, the communication in advance with you would have make all this
easier, sorry for not having done this.

Thanks Arnd. Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-19 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-17 11:35 [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1 Nicolas Ferre
2015-11-17 11:35 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-11-19 15:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-19 15:22   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-19 17:44   ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-11-19 17:44     ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-11-19 19:36     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-19 19:36       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=564E0A99.9020707@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.