All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: nico-vtqb6HGKxmzR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Roi Dayan <roid-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Hal Rosenstock
	<hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/iser: use sector_div instead of do_div
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 04:18:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564FD463.2020205@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5922990.8IJpyksX8K@wuerfel>


> do_div is the wrong way to divide a sector_t, as it is less
> efficient when sector_t is 32-bit wide. With the upcoming
> do_div optimizations, the kernel starts warning about this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c:1296:4: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
> include/asm-generic/div64.h:224:22: warning: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type
>
> This changes the code to use sector_div instead, which always
> produces optimal code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>

Thanks Arnd,

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il (Sagi Grimberg)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] IB/iser: use sector_div instead of do_div
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 04:18:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564FD463.2020205@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5922990.8IJpyksX8K@wuerfel>


> do_div is the wrong way to divide a sector_t, as it is less
> efficient when sector_t is 32-bit wide. With the upcoming
> do_div optimizations, the kernel starts warning about this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c:1296:4: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
> include/asm-generic/div64.h:224:22: warning: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type
>
> This changes the code to use sector_div instead, which always
> produces optimal code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks Arnd,

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Cc: nico@fluxnic.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/iser: use sector_div instead of do_div
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 04:18:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564FD463.2020205@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5922990.8IJpyksX8K@wuerfel>


> do_div is the wrong way to divide a sector_t, as it is less
> efficient when sector_t is 32-bit wide. With the upcoming
> do_div optimizations, the kernel starts warning about this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c:1296:4: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
> include/asm-generic/div64.h:224:22: warning: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type
>
> This changes the code to use sector_div instead, which always
> produces optimal code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks Arnd,

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-21  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-20 16:41 [PATCH] IB/iser: use sector_div instead of do_div Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-20 16:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-21  2:18 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2015-11-21  2:18   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-21  2:18   ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=564FD463.2020205@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --to=sagig-ldsdmyg8hgv8yrgs2mwiifqbs+8scbdb@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=nico-vtqb6HGKxmzR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=roid-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.