Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Standardise on NR_syscalls rather than __NR_syscalls.

[Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 11/19/2015 11:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> Most architectures use NR_syscalls as the #define for the number of syscalls.
> 
> We use __NR_syscalls, and then define NR_syscalls as __NR_syscalls.
> 
> __NR_syscalls is not used outside arch code, whereas NR_syscalls is. So as
> NR_syscalls must be defined and __NR_syscalls does not, replace __NR_syscalls
> with NR_syscalls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmicy@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h        | 3 +--
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso_datapage.h | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/systbl_chk.c         | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/systbl_chk.sh        | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c               | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/datapage.S    | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/datapage.S    | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c  | 2 +-
>  8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
> index 6d8f8023ac27..05bf34296144 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -12,10 +12,9 @@
>  #include <uapi/asm/unistd.h>
>  
>  
> -#define __NR_syscalls		378
> +#define NR_syscalls		378

This does not apply any more because of Michael's recent mlock2() system
call enablement commit. Please do rebase and resend.

- Anshuman