From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [mm, page_alloc] d0164adc89: -100.0% fsmark.app_overhead
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:03:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56571F25.5030905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151126132511.GG14880@techsingularity.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 903 bytes --]
On 11/26/2015 08:25 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:56:12AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> commit d0164adc89f6bb374d304ffcc375c6d2652fe67d ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd")
>>
>> Note: the testing machine is a virtual machine with only 1G memory.
>>
>
> I'm not actually seeing any problem here. Is this a positive report or
> am I missing something obvious?
I've gotten several reports that could be either
positive or negative, but where I am not quite
sure how to interpret the results.
The tool seems to CC the maintainers of the code
that was changed, so I am hoping they will pipe
up when they see a problem.
Of course, that doesn't help in this case :)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [mm, page_alloc] d0164adc89: -100.0% fsmark.app_overhead
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:03:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56571F25.5030905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151126132511.GG14880@techsingularity.net>
On 11/26/2015 08:25 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:56:12AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> commit d0164adc89f6bb374d304ffcc375c6d2652fe67d ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd")
>>
>> Note: the testing machine is a virtual machine with only 1G memory.
>>
>
> I'm not actually seeing any problem here. Is this a positive report or
> am I missing something obvious?
I've gotten several reports that could be either
positive or negative, but where I am not quite
sure how to interpret the results.
The tool seems to CC the maintainers of the code
that was changed, so I am hoping they will pipe
up when they see a problem.
Of course, that doesn't help in this case :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 0:56 [mm, page_alloc] d0164adc89: -100.0% fsmark.app_overhead kernel test robot
2015-11-26 0:56 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2015-11-26 13:25 ` Mel Gorman
2015-11-26 15:03 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-11-26 15:03 ` Rik van Riel
2015-11-27 1:14 ` Huang, Ying
2015-11-27 1:14 ` [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2015-11-27 10:06 ` Mel Gorman
2015-11-30 2:14 ` Huang, Ying
2015-11-30 2:14 ` [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2015-11-30 13:02 ` Michal Hocko
2015-11-30 13:02 ` [lkp] " Michal Hocko
2015-12-01 12:23 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-01 12:23 ` [lkp] " Will Deacon
2015-12-01 14:04 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-01 14:04 ` [lkp] " Michal Hocko
2015-12-02 11:10 ` Mel Gorman
2015-12-02 11:00 ` Mel Gorman
2015-12-02 12:00 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-02 12:00 ` [lkp] " Michal Hocko
2015-12-02 14:08 ` Mel Gorman
2015-12-02 14:15 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-02 14:15 ` [lkp] " Michal Hocko
2015-12-02 14:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-12-03 8:46 ` Huang, Ying
2015-12-03 8:46 ` [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2015-12-03 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
2015-12-04 1:53 ` Huang, Ying
2015-12-04 1:53 ` [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2015-12-07 16:18 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-07 16:18 ` [lkp] " Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56571F25.5030905@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.