From: yang.shi@linaro.org (Shi, Yang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: bpf: add 'store immediate' instruction
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:20:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565E1D38.7020906@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448922247-5692-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
On 11/30/2015 2:24 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> aarch64 doesn't have native store immediate instruction, such operation
> has to be implemented by the below instruction sequence:
>
> Load immediate to register
> Store register
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
> CC: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Had email exchange offline with Zi Shen Lim since he is traveling and
cannot send text-only mail, quoted below for his reply:
"I've given reviewed-by in response to original posting. Unless
something has changed, feel free to add it."
Since there is nothing changed, added his reviewed-by.
Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Yang
> CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
> ---
> Thsi patch might be buried by the storm of xadd discussion, however, it is
> absolutely irrelevent to xadd, so resend the patch itself.
>
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 6809647..49c1f1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -563,7 +563,25 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
> case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
> case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
> case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
> - goto notyet;
> + /* Load imm to a register then store it */
> + ctx->tmp_used = 1;
> + emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp2, off, ctx);
> + emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, imm, ctx);
> + switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
> + case BPF_W:
> + emit(A64_STR32(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + case BPF_H:
> + emit(A64_STRH(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + case BPF_B:
> + emit(A64_STRB(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + case BPF_DW:
> + emit(A64_STR64(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + }
> + break;
>
> /* STX: *(size *)(dst + off) = src */
> case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
To: ast@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Cc: zlim.lnx@gmail.com, xi.wang@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: bpf: add 'store immediate' instruction
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:20:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565E1D38.7020906@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448922247-5692-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
On 11/30/2015 2:24 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> aarch64 doesn't have native store immediate instruction, such operation
> has to be implemented by the below instruction sequence:
>
> Load immediate to register
> Store register
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
> CC: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Had email exchange offline with Zi Shen Lim since he is traveling and
cannot send text-only mail, quoted below for his reply:
"I've given reviewed-by in response to original posting. Unless
something has changed, feel free to add it."
Since there is nothing changed, added his reviewed-by.
Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Yang
> CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
> ---
> Thsi patch might be buried by the storm of xadd discussion, however, it is
> absolutely irrelevent to xadd, so resend the patch itself.
>
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 6809647..49c1f1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -563,7 +563,25 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
> case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
> case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
> case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
> - goto notyet;
> + /* Load imm to a register then store it */
> + ctx->tmp_used = 1;
> + emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp2, off, ctx);
> + emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, imm, ctx);
> + switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
> + case BPF_W:
> + emit(A64_STR32(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + case BPF_H:
> + emit(A64_STRH(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + case BPF_B:
> + emit(A64_STRB(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + case BPF_DW:
> + emit(A64_STR64(tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
> + break;
> + }
> + break;
>
> /* STX: *(size *)(dst + off) = src */
> case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 22:24 [RESEND PATCH] arm64: bpf: add 'store immediate' instruction Yang Shi
2015-11-30 22:24 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-01 22:20 ` Shi, Yang [this message]
2015-12-01 22:20 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-02 9:15 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 9:15 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 20:42 ` David Miller
2015-12-02 20:42 ` David Miller
2015-12-03 16:38 ` David Miller
2015-12-03 16:38 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565E1D38.7020906@linaro.org \
--to=yang.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.