All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: add SMP enable-method for Broadcom NSP
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 13:18:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660B1B5.5000702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565F16F1.9070809@broadcom.com>

On 02/12/15 08:06, Kapil Hali wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>>> +Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC CPU Enable Method
>>> +---------------------------------------------
>>> +This binding defines the enable method used for starting secondary
>>> +CPUs in the following Broadcom SoCs:
>>> +  BCM58522, BCM58525, BCM58535, BCM58622, BCM58623, BCM58625, BCM88312
>>> +
>>> +The enable method is specified by defining the following required
>>> +properties in the "cpus" device tree node:
>>> +  - enable-method = "brcm,bcm-nsp-smp";
>>> +  - secondary-boot-reg = <...>;
>>
>> Both of these are supposed to be per cpu core.
> 
> 'enable-method' if not found in 'cpu' node is looked at in the 'cpus' 
> node. Except for two-three SoC families, 'enable-method' is within 
> 'cpus' node. Is my interpretation incorrect? Did I miss anything here?

So, what do we do from here? I would appreciate a timely answer from the
DT maintainers here so we can decide on the fate of this patch series
for 4.5.

Thank you
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Kapil Hali <kapilh@broadcom.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: add SMP enable-method for Broadcom NSP
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 13:18:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660B1B5.5000702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565F16F1.9070809@broadcom.com>

On 02/12/15 08:06, Kapil Hali wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>>> +Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC CPU Enable Method
>>> +---------------------------------------------
>>> +This binding defines the enable method used for starting secondary
>>> +CPUs in the following Broadcom SoCs:
>>> +  BCM58522, BCM58525, BCM58535, BCM58622, BCM58623, BCM58625, BCM88312
>>> +
>>> +The enable method is specified by defining the following required
>>> +properties in the "cpus" device tree node:
>>> +  - enable-method = "brcm,bcm-nsp-smp";
>>> +  - secondary-boot-reg = <...>;
>>
>> Both of these are supposed to be per cpu core.
> 
> 'enable-method' if not found in 'cpu' node is looked at in the 'cpus' 
> node. Except for two-three SoC families, 'enable-method' is within 
> 'cpus' node. Is my interpretation incorrect? Did I miss anything here?

So, what do we do from here? I would appreciate a timely answer from the
DT maintainers here so we can decide on the fate of this patch series
for 4.5.

Thank you
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Kapil Hali <kapilh@broadcom.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: add SMP enable-method for Broadcom NSP
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 13:18:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660B1B5.5000702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565F16F1.9070809@broadcom.com>

On 02/12/15 08:06, Kapil Hali wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp-cpu-method.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>>> +Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC CPU Enable Method
>>> +---------------------------------------------
>>> +This binding defines the enable method used for starting secondary
>>> +CPUs in the following Broadcom SoCs:
>>> +  BCM58522, BCM58525, BCM58535, BCM58622, BCM58623, BCM58625, BCM88312
>>> +
>>> +The enable method is specified by defining the following required
>>> +properties in the "cpus" device tree node:
>>> +  - enable-method = "brcm,bcm-nsp-smp";
>>> +  - secondary-boot-reg = <...>;
>>
>> Both of these are supposed to be per cpu core.
> 
> 'enable-method' if not found in 'cpu' node is looked at in the 'cpus' 
> node. Except for two-three SoC families, 'enable-method' is within 
> 'cpus' node. Is my interpretation incorrect? Did I miss anything here?

So, what do we do from here? I would appreciate a timely answer from the
DT maintainers here so we can decide on the fate of this patch series
for 4.5.

Thank you
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-03 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-01 16:24 [PATCH v4 0/5] SMP support for Broadcom NSP Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24 ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24 ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: add SMP enable-method " Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 23:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:06     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-02 15:26   ` Rob Herring
2015-12-02 15:26     ` Rob Herring
2015-12-02 15:26     ` Rob Herring
2015-12-02 16:06     ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-02 16:06       ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-02 16:06       ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-03 21:18       ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-12-03 21:18         ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-03 21:18         ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-06  0:52       ` Rob Herring
2015-12-06  0:52         ` Rob Herring
2015-12-06  0:52         ` Rob Herring
2015-12-06 18:29         ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-06 18:29           ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-06 18:29           ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: BCM: Clean up SMP support for Broadcom Kona Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 23:07   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:07     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-02  1:54   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-02  1:54     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-02  1:54     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ARM: dts: Add SMP support for Broadcom NSP Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 23:07   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:07     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:07     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: BCM: " Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 23:07   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:07     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:07     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: BCM: Add SMP support for Broadcom 4708 Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 16:24   ` Kapil Hali
2015-12-01 23:07   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:07     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-01 23:07     ` Florian Fainelli
2015-12-02 15:03   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-12-02 15:03     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-12-02 15:03     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-12-03 21:08     ` Jon Mason
2015-12-03 21:08       ` Jon Mason
2015-12-03 21:08       ` Jon Mason
2015-12-03 22:55       ` Jon Mason
2015-12-03 22:55         ` Jon Mason
2015-12-03 22:55         ` Jon Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5660B1B5.5000702@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.