From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] mm/gup: add gup trace points
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:10:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660BDC2.5060400@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203140614.75f49aad@gandalf.local.home>
On 12/3/2015 11:06 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:36:18 -0800
> "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>>> called directly that calls these functions internally and the tracepoint
>>> can trap the return value.
>>
>> This will incur more changes in other subsystems (futex, kvm, etc), I'm
>> not sure if it is worth making such changes to get return value.
>
> No, it wouldn't require any changes outside of this.
>
> -long __get_user_pages(..)
> +static long __get_user_pages_internal(..)
> {
> [..]
> }
> +
> +long __get_user_pages(..)
> +{
> + long ret;
> + ret = __get_user_pages_internal(..);
> + trace_get_user_pages(.., ret)
> +}
Thanks for this. I just checked the fast version, it looks it just has
single return path, so this should be just needed by slow version.
>
>>
>>> I can probably make function_graph tracer give return values, although
>>> it will give a return value for void functions as well. And it may give
>>> long long returns for int returns that may have bogus data in the
>>> higher bits.
>>
>> If the return value requirement is not limited to gup, the approach
>> sounds more reasonable.
>>
>
> Others have asked about it. Maybe I should do it.
If you are going to add return value in common trace code, I won't do
the gup specific one in V3.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> -- Steve
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] mm/gup: add gup trace points
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:10:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660BDC2.5060400@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203140614.75f49aad@gandalf.local.home>
On 12/3/2015 11:06 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:36:18 -0800
> "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>>> called directly that calls these functions internally and the tracepoint
>>> can trap the return value.
>>
>> This will incur more changes in other subsystems (futex, kvm, etc), I'm
>> not sure if it is worth making such changes to get return value.
>
> No, it wouldn't require any changes outside of this.
>
> -long __get_user_pages(..)
> +static long __get_user_pages_internal(..)
> {
> [..]
> }
> +
> +long __get_user_pages(..)
> +{
> + long ret;
> + ret = __get_user_pages_internal(..);
> + trace_get_user_pages(.., ret)
> +}
Thanks for this. I just checked the fast version, it looks it just has
single return path, so this should be just needed by slow version.
>
>>
>>> I can probably make function_graph tracer give return values, although
>>> it will give a return value for void functions as well. And it may give
>>> long long returns for int returns that may have bogus data in the
>>> higher bits.
>>
>> If the return value requirement is not limited to gup, the approach
>> sounds more reasonable.
>>
>
> Others have asked about it. Maybe I should do it.
If you are going to add return value in common trace code, I won't do
the gup specific one in V3.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> -- Steve
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-02 22:53 [RFC V2] Add gup trace points support Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] trace/events: Add gup trace events Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-03 4:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 4:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 18:36 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 18:36 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-02 22:53 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] mm/gup: add gup trace points Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 23:36 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-02 23:36 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-03 0:11 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 0:11 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 0:52 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 0:52 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 4:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 4:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 18:36 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 18:36 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 22:10 ` Shi, Yang [this message]
2015-12-03 22:10 ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-02 22:53 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] x86: " Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] mips: " Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] s390: " Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] sh: " Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] sparc64: " Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
2015-12-02 22:53 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5660BDC2.5060400@linaro.org \
--to=yang.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.