All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] mm/compaction: update defer counter when allocation is expected to succeed
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:52:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5661C4C5.2020901@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449126681-19647-5-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

On 12/03/2015 08:11 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> It's rather strange that compact_considered and compact_defer_shift aren't
> updated but compact_order_failed is updated when allocation is expected
> to succeed. Regardless actual allocation success, deferring for current
> order will be disabled so it doesn't result in much difference to
> compaction behaviour.

The difference is that if the defer reset was wrong, the next compaction 
attempt that fails would resume the deferred counters?

> Moreover, in the past, there is a gap between expectation for allocation
> succeess in compaction and actual success in page allocator. But, now,
> this gap would be diminished due to providing classzone_idx and alloc_flags
> to watermark check in compaction and changed watermark check criteria
> for high-order allocation. Therfore, it's not a big problem to update
> defer counter when allocation is expected to succeed. This change
> will help to simplify defer logic.

I guess that's true. But at least some experiment would be better.

> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/compaction.h |  2 --
>   mm/compaction.c            | 27 ++++++++-------------------
>   mm/page_alloc.c            |  1 -
>   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>

...

> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 7002c66..f3605fd 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2815,7 +2815,6 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>   		struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
>
>   		zone->compact_blockskip_flush = false;

While we are here, I wonder if this is useful at all? 
compact_blockskip_flush is set true when scanners meet. That typically 
means the compaction wasn't successful. Rarely it can be, but I doubt 
this will make much difference, so we could remove this line as well.

> -		compaction_defer_reset(zone, order, true);
>   		count_vm_event(COMPACTSUCCESS);
>   		return page;
>   	}
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] mm/compaction: update defer counter when allocation is expected to succeed
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:52:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5661C4C5.2020901@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449126681-19647-5-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

On 12/03/2015 08:11 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> It's rather strange that compact_considered and compact_defer_shift aren't
> updated but compact_order_failed is updated when allocation is expected
> to succeed. Regardless actual allocation success, deferring for current
> order will be disabled so it doesn't result in much difference to
> compaction behaviour.

The difference is that if the defer reset was wrong, the next compaction 
attempt that fails would resume the deferred counters?

> Moreover, in the past, there is a gap between expectation for allocation
> succeess in compaction and actual success in page allocator. But, now,
> this gap would be diminished due to providing classzone_idx and alloc_flags
> to watermark check in compaction and changed watermark check criteria
> for high-order allocation. Therfore, it's not a big problem to update
> defer counter when allocation is expected to succeed. This change
> will help to simplify defer logic.

I guess that's true. But at least some experiment would be better.

> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/compaction.h |  2 --
>   mm/compaction.c            | 27 ++++++++-------------------
>   mm/page_alloc.c            |  1 -
>   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>

...

> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 7002c66..f3605fd 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2815,7 +2815,6 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>   		struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
>
>   		zone->compact_blockskip_flush = false;

While we are here, I wonder if this is useful at all? 
compact_blockskip_flush is set true when scanners meet. That typically 
means the compaction wasn't successful. Rarely it can be, but I doubt 
this will make much difference, so we could remove this line as well.

> -		compaction_defer_reset(zone, order, true);
>   		count_vm_event(COMPACTSUCCESS);
>   		return page;
>   	}
>


  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-04 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03  7:11 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm/compaction: redesign compaction: part1 Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm/compaction: skip useless pfn when updating cached pfn Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03 10:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-03 10:36     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-07  7:37     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-07  7:37       ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm/compaction: remove unused defer_compaction() in compaction.h Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-04 15:29   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-04 15:29     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-03  7:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm/compaction: initialize compact_order_failed to MAX_ORDER Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-04 15:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-04 15:36     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-03  7:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm/compaction: update defer counter when allocation is expected to succeed Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-04 16:52   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2015-12-04 16:52     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-07  8:03     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-07  8:03       ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm/compaction: respect compaction order when updating defer counter Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-04 17:15   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-04 17:15     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-07  8:04     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-07  8:04       ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm/compaction: introduce migration scan limit Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-14  9:34   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-14  9:34     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-16  5:39     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-16  5:39       ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm/compaction: replace compaction deferring with compaction limit Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-03  7:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-12-14  9:55   ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-12-14  9:55     ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5661C4C5.2020901@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.