All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] video: fbdev: pxafb: initial devicetree conversion
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:29:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56699A57.9030209@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bna2kmp7.fsf@belgarion.home>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]


On 07/12/15 22:50, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

>> It seems that at least "depth" is missing from the binding document.
> You're right.
> 
> Actually depth is not a "hardware" caracteristic. Moreover it's just used as an
> overlay for pxafb_set_pixfmt() to superseed var->bits_per_pixel. I'm wondering
> if the right path for of_get_pxafb_mode_info() would be to remove completely
> depth, and leave it initialized at 0 for the DT case.
> 
> What do you think of this approach ? The other one would be to modify the
> binding, and yet I feel this depth doesn't belong to the binding, it's my patch
> which requires another spin IMHO.

Yes, we should avoid non-hardware relate properties in the .dts files if
at all possible. If the driver works fine without the property, I think
it's fine to remove it. If it is required it needs to be added to the
binding document.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] video: fbdev: pxafb: initial devicetree conversion
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:29:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56699A57.9030209@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bna2kmp7.fsf@belgarion.home>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]


On 07/12/15 22:50, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

>> It seems that at least "depth" is missing from the binding document.
> You're right.
> 
> Actually depth is not a "hardware" caracteristic. Moreover it's just used as an
> overlay for pxafb_set_pixfmt() to superseed var->bits_per_pixel. I'm wondering
> if the right path for of_get_pxafb_mode_info() would be to remove completely
> depth, and leave it initialized at 0 for the DT case.
> 
> What do you think of this approach ? The other one would be to modify the
> binding, and yet I feel this depth doesn't belong to the binding, it's my patch
> which requires another spin IMHO.

Yes, we should avoid non-hardware relate properties in the .dts files if
at all possible. If the driver works fine without the property, I think
it's fine to remove it. If it is required it needs to be added to the
binding document.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-17 20:32 [PATCH v5 1/2] video: fbdev: pxafb: loosen the platform data bond Robert Jarzmik
2015-11-17 20:32 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-11-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] video: fbdev: pxafb: initial devicetree conversion Robert Jarzmik
2015-11-17 20:32   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-12-07 16:28   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-07 16:28     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-07 20:50     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-12-07 20:50       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-12-10 15:29       ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2015-12-10 15:29         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-10 17:34         ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-12-10 17:34           ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56699A57.9030209@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.