From: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
To: Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: designware: add memory barrier after enabling region
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:45:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5672D8A1.2080407@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHM4w1m-NiwyCLz9tikbOcNtCmVu0Vd9FhmKKSuMi5ChzfDafA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/11/2015 06:05 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2);
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * ensure that the ATU enable has been happaned before accessing
>>>>> + * pci configuration/io spaces through dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write].
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + wmb();
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My understnading is that since writel() of dw_pcie_writel_rc() in
>>> above code and readl(), writel() of dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write]() (which
>>> will follow) goes through same device (ie PCIe host here). So, it is
>>> guaranteed that 1st writel() will be executed before later
>>> readl()/writel(). If that is true then we do not need any explicit
>>> barrier here.
>>>
>>> Arnd, Russel: whats your opinion here.
>> ^l
>
> Sorry :(
>
>>
>> writel() has a barrier _before_ the access but not after.
>>
>> The fact is that there's nothing which guarantees that the write will hit
>> the hardware in a timely manner (forget any rules about PCI config space,
>> the PCI ordering rules apply to the PCI bus, not to the ARM buses.)
>>
>> If you need this write to have hit the hardware before continuing, you
>> need to read back from the same register.
>
> OK, so better to replace wmb() with read back of control register.
Would the patch be acceptable if I replace wmb with read?
--
regards,
Stan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org (Stanimir Varbanov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: designware: add memory barrier after enabling region
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:45:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5672D8A1.2080407@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHM4w1m-NiwyCLz9tikbOcNtCmVu0Vd9FhmKKSuMi5ChzfDafA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/11/2015 06:05 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2);
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * ensure that the ATU enable has been happaned before accessing
>>>>> + * pci configuration/io spaces through dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write].
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + wmb();
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My understnading is that since writel() of dw_pcie_writel_rc() in
>>> above code and readl(), writel() of dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write]() (which
>>> will follow) goes through same device (ie PCIe host here). So, it is
>>> guaranteed that 1st writel() will be executed before later
>>> readl()/writel(). If that is true then we do not need any explicit
>>> barrier here.
>>>
>>> Arnd, Russel: whats your opinion here.
>> ^l
>
> Sorry :(
>
>>
>> writel() has a barrier _before_ the access but not after.
>>
>> The fact is that there's nothing which guarantees that the write will hit
>> the hardware in a timely manner (forget any rules about PCI config space,
>> the PCI ordering rules apply to the PCI bus, not to the ARM buses.)
>>
>> If you need this write to have hit the hardware before continuing, you
>> need to read back from the same register.
>
> OK, so better to replace wmb() with read back of control register.
Would the patch be acceptable if I replace wmb with read?
--
regards,
Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 13:35 [PATCH v4 0/5] Qualcomm PCIe driver and designware fixes Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: designware: add memory barrier after enabling region Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-08 9:01 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-08 9:01 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-09 4:40 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-09 4:40 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-09 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-09 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-09 10:29 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-09 10:29 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-09 10:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-09 10:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-11 4:05 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-11 4:05 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-11 5:48 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-11 5:48 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-11 5:48 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-22 12:36 ` Jingoo Han
2015-12-22 12:36 ` Jingoo Han
2015-12-22 12:36 ` Jingoo Han
2015-12-17 15:45 ` Stanimir Varbanov [this message]
2015-12-17 15:45 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 15:51 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-17 15:51 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <1449149725-27607-1-git-send-email-stanimir.varbanov-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] DT: PCI: qcom: Document PCIe devicetree bindings Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 20:42 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-03 20:42 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: dts: apq8064: add pcie devicetree node Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe controller driver Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-15 8:24 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-15 8:24 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-16 21:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-16 21:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-16 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-16 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-17 13:18 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 13:18 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 21:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-17 21:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: ifc6410: enable pcie dt node for this board Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` Stanimir Varbanov
[not found] ` <1449149725-27607-6-git-send-email-stanimir.varbanov-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-17 21:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-17 21:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-17 21:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-18 9:57 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-18 9:57 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-07 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Qualcomm PCIe driver and designware fixes Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-12-07 17:33 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5672D8A1.2080407@linaro.org \
--to=stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.