From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"open list:SYSTEM CONTROL & POWER INTERFACE (SCPI) Message..."
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:48:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <567A7BF8.1030107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450867041-729-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com>
On 23/12/15 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
There has a patch posted by Dan Carpenter [1] which I reposted[2],
but it again slipped through the cracks. I will poke Rafael again on that.
[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/380292.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/219
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:48:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <567A7BF8.1030107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450867041-729-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com>
On 23/12/15 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
There has a patch posted by Dan Carpenter [1] which I reposted[2],
but it again slipped through the cracks. I will poke Rafael again on that.
[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/380292.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/219
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-23 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 10:37 [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 22:35 ` Ray Jui
2015-12-23 22:35 ` Ray Jui
2015-12-24 5:33 ` Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
2015-12-24 5:33 ` Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
2015-12-24 9:03 ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-24 9:03 ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] NFC: nci: fix handling return value of nci_hci_create_pipe Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24 0:04 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24 5:56 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24 6:14 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24 6:14 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24 7:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24 7:02 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24 7:38 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-30 17:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-30 17:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-30 18:05 ` Applied "ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2015-12-23 10:41 ` [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id Viresh Kumar
2015-12-23 10:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-23 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-12-23 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=567A7BF8.1030107@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.