From: He YunLei <heyunlei@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for total_extent_tree
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:11:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56826A59.3020105@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450755521-20015-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
On 2015/12/22 11:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> It would be better to use atomic variable for total_extent_tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/debug.c | 5 +++--
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++-
> fs/f2fs/shrinker.c | 3 ++-
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> index bb307e6..ed5dfcc 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void update_general_status(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> si->hit_rbtree = atomic64_read(&sbi->read_hit_rbtree);
> si->hit_total = si->hit_largest + si->hit_cached + si->hit_rbtree;
> si->total_ext = atomic64_read(&sbi->total_hit_ext);
> - si->ext_tree = sbi->total_ext_tree;
> + si->ext_tree = atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> si->ext_node = atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> si->ndirty_node = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> si->ndirty_dent = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
> @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ get_cache:
> si->cache_mem += si->inmem_pages * sizeof(struct inmem_pages);
> for (i = 0; i <= UPDATE_INO; i++)
> si->cache_mem += sbi->im[i].ino_num * sizeof(struct ino_entry);
> - si->cache_mem += sbi->total_ext_tree * sizeof(struct extent_tree);
> + si->cache_mem += atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) *
> + sizeof(struct extent_tree);
> si->cache_mem += atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node) *
> sizeof(struct extent_node);
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index e86e9f1e..0e97d6af 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> rwlock_init(&et->lock);
> atomic_set(&et->refcount, 0);
> et->count = 0;
> - sbi->total_ext_tree++;
> + atomic_inc(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> }
> atomic_inc(&et->refcount);
> up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
>
> radix_tree_delete(root, et->ino);
> kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
> - sbi->total_ext_tree--;
> + atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> tree_cnt++;
>
> if (node_cnt + tree_cnt >= nr_shrink)
> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->refcount) || et->count);
> radix_tree_delete(&sbi->extent_tree_root, inode->i_ino);
> kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
> - sbi->total_ext_tree--;
> + atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
>
> F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree = NULL;
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ void init_extent_cache_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> init_rwsem(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->extent_list);
> spin_lock_init(&sbi->extent_lock);
> - sbi->total_ext_tree = 0;
> + atomic_set(&sbi->total_ext_tree, 0);
Hi,
here we'd better to init total_zombie_tree:
atomic_set(&sbi->total_zombie_tree, 0);
Thanks,
> atomic_set(&sbi->total_ext_node, 0);
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 19beabe..a7f6191 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> struct rw_semaphore extent_tree_lock; /* locking extent radix tree */
> struct list_head extent_list; /* lru list for shrinker */
> spinlock_t extent_lock; /* locking extent lru list */
> - int total_ext_tree; /* extent tree count */
> + atomic_t total_ext_tree; /* extent tree count */
> atomic_t total_ext_node; /* extent info count */
>
> /* basic filesystem units */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index d842b19..6cc8ac7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ bool available_free_memory(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> sizeof(struct ino_entry)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1);
> } else if (type == EXTENT_CACHE) {
> - mem_size = (sbi->total_ext_tree * sizeof(struct extent_tree) +
> + mem_size = (atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) *
> + sizeof(struct extent_tree) +
> atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node) *
> sizeof(struct extent_node)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> index da0d8e0..a11e099 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ static unsigned long __count_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> static unsigned long __count_extent_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> - return sbi->total_ext_tree + atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> + return atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) +
> + atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> }
>
> unsigned long f2fs_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: He YunLei <heyunlei@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for total_extent_tree
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:11:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56826A59.3020105@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450755521-20015-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
On 2015/12/22 11:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> It would be better to use atomic variable for total_extent_tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/debug.c | 5 +++--
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++-
> fs/f2fs/shrinker.c | 3 ++-
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> index bb307e6..ed5dfcc 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void update_general_status(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> si->hit_rbtree = atomic64_read(&sbi->read_hit_rbtree);
> si->hit_total = si->hit_largest + si->hit_cached + si->hit_rbtree;
> si->total_ext = atomic64_read(&sbi->total_hit_ext);
> - si->ext_tree = sbi->total_ext_tree;
> + si->ext_tree = atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> si->ext_node = atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> si->ndirty_node = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> si->ndirty_dent = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
> @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ get_cache:
> si->cache_mem += si->inmem_pages * sizeof(struct inmem_pages);
> for (i = 0; i <= UPDATE_INO; i++)
> si->cache_mem += sbi->im[i].ino_num * sizeof(struct ino_entry);
> - si->cache_mem += sbi->total_ext_tree * sizeof(struct extent_tree);
> + si->cache_mem += atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) *
> + sizeof(struct extent_tree);
> si->cache_mem += atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node) *
> sizeof(struct extent_node);
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index e86e9f1e..0e97d6af 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> rwlock_init(&et->lock);
> atomic_set(&et->refcount, 0);
> et->count = 0;
> - sbi->total_ext_tree++;
> + atomic_inc(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> }
> atomic_inc(&et->refcount);
> up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
>
> radix_tree_delete(root, et->ino);
> kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
> - sbi->total_ext_tree--;
> + atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> tree_cnt++;
>
> if (node_cnt + tree_cnt >= nr_shrink)
> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->refcount) || et->count);
> radix_tree_delete(&sbi->extent_tree_root, inode->i_ino);
> kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
> - sbi->total_ext_tree--;
> + atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
>
> F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree = NULL;
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ void init_extent_cache_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> init_rwsem(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->extent_list);
> spin_lock_init(&sbi->extent_lock);
> - sbi->total_ext_tree = 0;
> + atomic_set(&sbi->total_ext_tree, 0);
Hi,
here we'd better to init total_zombie_tree:
atomic_set(&sbi->total_zombie_tree, 0);
Thanks,
> atomic_set(&sbi->total_ext_node, 0);
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 19beabe..a7f6191 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> struct rw_semaphore extent_tree_lock; /* locking extent radix tree */
> struct list_head extent_list; /* lru list for shrinker */
> spinlock_t extent_lock; /* locking extent lru list */
> - int total_ext_tree; /* extent tree count */
> + atomic_t total_ext_tree; /* extent tree count */
> atomic_t total_ext_node; /* extent info count */
>
> /* basic filesystem units */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index d842b19..6cc8ac7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ bool available_free_memory(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> sizeof(struct ino_entry)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1);
> } else if (type == EXTENT_CACHE) {
> - mem_size = (sbi->total_ext_tree * sizeof(struct extent_tree) +
> + mem_size = (atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) *
> + sizeof(struct extent_tree) +
> atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node) *
> sizeof(struct extent_node)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> index da0d8e0..a11e099 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ static unsigned long __count_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> static unsigned long __count_extent_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> - return sbi->total_ext_tree + atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> + return atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) +
> + atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> }
>
> unsigned long f2fs_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-29 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-22 3:38 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for total_extent_tree Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent tree entries Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22 3:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22 3:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22 5:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-22 7:36 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22 12:34 ` He YunLei
2015-12-22 12:34 ` He YunLei
2015-12-23 9:52 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-22 5:28 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for total_extent_tree Chao Yu
2015-12-22 7:34 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22 8:08 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-29 11:11 ` He YunLei [this message]
2015-12-29 11:11 ` He YunLei
2015-12-30 6:44 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56826A59.3020105@huawei.com \
--to=heyunlei@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.