From: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>,
openembedded-devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-01
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:24:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56884E30.2080703@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+chaQfGTBOqGyGq6S7fMbP8c9rdm+1cDrc===xA1kOF=+WGOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/02/16 13:19, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - meta-openembedded ==
...
> 7020a19 nodejs: cleanup and update
...
>
> == Failed tasks 2016-01-01 ==
...
>
> === qemuarm (1) ===
> * /meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_4.2.2.bb <http://nodejs_4.2.2.bb>, do_compile
>
Can it really be considered a failed build when the recipe explicitly
excludes qemuarm (armv5) from the compatible machine list?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>,
openembedded-devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-01
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:24:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56884E30.2080703@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+chaQfGTBOqGyGq6S7fMbP8c9rdm+1cDrc===xA1kOF=+WGOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/02/16 13:19, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - meta-openembedded ==
...
> 7020a19 nodejs: cleanup and update
...
>
> == Failed tasks 2016-01-01 ==
...
>
> === qemuarm (1) ===
> * /meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_4.2.2.bb <http://nodejs_4.2.2.bb>, do_compile
>
Can it really be considered a failed build when the recipe explicitly
excludes qemuarm (armv5) from the compatible machine list?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-02 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-02 18:19 State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-01 Martin Jansa
2016-01-02 18:19 ` Martin Jansa
2016-01-02 22:24 ` Trevor Woerner [this message]
2016-01-02 22:24 ` Trevor Woerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56884E30.2080703@gmail.com \
--to=twoerner@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.