[PATCH v8 3/4] arm64/arm, numa, dt: adding numa dt binding implementation for arm64 platforms.

[zhaoshenglong@huawei.com (Shannon Zhao)]

Hi Ganapatrao,


On 2015/12/29 18:32, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> +static int __init early_init_parse_memory_node(unsigned long node)
> +{
> +	const __be32 *reg, *endp;
> +	int length;
> +	int nid;
> +
> +	const char *type = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "device_type", NULL);
> +
> +	/* We are scanning "memory" nodes only */
> +	if (type == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +	else if (strcmp(type, "memory") != 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	nid = early_init_of_get_numa_nid(node);
> +
> +	if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &length);
> +	endp = reg + (length / sizeof(__be32));
> +
> +	while ((endp - reg) >= (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells)) {
> +		u64 base, size;
> +		struct memblock_region *mblk;
> +
> +		base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &reg);
> +		size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, &reg);
> +		pr_debug("NUMA-DT:  base = %llx , node = %u\n",
> +				base, nid);
> +
> +		for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) {
> +			if (mblk->base == base) {
> +				if (numa_add_memblk(nid,
> +							mblk->base,
> +							mblk->size) < 0)
> +					return -EINVAL;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Here it seems that you didn't address the comments[1] I gave on your
previous patch set.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg104493.html

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon