From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:09:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568C2316.8030302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d1tfrdu0.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
On 05/01/16 12:06, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:15:50 -0800 Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll be sending pull-requests to Florian soon, but I would like to get
>>> my trees included in linux-next to get increased testing coverage of
>>> them against everything else going on for 4.5. I'm expecting to produce
>>> trees under these branch names for the forseeable future.
>>>
>>> Repo: https://github.com/anholt/linux.git
>>>
>>> branches:
>>> drm-vc4-next
>>> bcm2835-dt-next
>>> bcm2835-soc-next
>>> bcm2835-drivers-next
>>> bcm2385-defconfig-next
>>> (bcm2835-maintainers-next is a placeholder since we have nothing for it
>>> this round)
>>
>> I have added the first 5 from today. Can you tell me which trees they
>> will be merged via so I can position them in my list correctly,
>> please?
>
> drm-vc4-next goes through airlied's drm-next. bcm2835-* are intended to
> go through Florian's stblinux tree, though things didn't go that way
> this time because I'm still figuring out timelines.
>
> Looking through Next/Trees, it looks like stblinux isn't in the list.
> That seems like something that would be useful, given that Florian's
> been successfully sending pull requests to arm-soc for at least a couple
> of releases. (<1445718981-13552-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
> for example). His branches appear to be defconfig/next,
> devicetree/next, maintainers/next, and soc/next, all on
> https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux.git.
Correct, there is also devicetree-arm64/next for ARM64 DTS changes,
which could be helpful to have.
--
Florian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:09:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568C2316.8030302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d1tfrdu0.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
On 05/01/16 12:06, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:15:50 -0800 Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll be sending pull-requests to Florian soon, but I would like to get
>>> my trees included in linux-next to get increased testing coverage of
>>> them against everything else going on for 4.5. I'm expecting to produce
>>> trees under these branch names for the forseeable future.
>>>
>>> Repo: https://github.com/anholt/linux.git
>>>
>>> branches:
>>> drm-vc4-next
>>> bcm2835-dt-next
>>> bcm2835-soc-next
>>> bcm2835-drivers-next
>>> bcm2385-defconfig-next
>>> (bcm2835-maintainers-next is a placeholder since we have nothing for it
>>> this round)
>>
>> I have added the first 5 from today. Can you tell me which trees they
>> will be merged via so I can position them in my list correctly,
>> please?
>
> drm-vc4-next goes through airlied's drm-next. bcm2835-* are intended to
> go through Florian's stblinux tree, though things didn't go that way
> this time because I'm still figuring out timelines.
>
> Looking through Next/Trees, it looks like stblinux isn't in the list.
> That seems like something that would be useful, given that Florian's
> been successfully sending pull requests to arm-soc for at least a couple
> of releases. (<1445718981-13552-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
> for example). His branches appear to be defconfig/next,
> devicetree/next, maintainers/next, and soc/next, all on
> https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux.git.
Correct, there is also devicetree-arm64/next for ARM64 DTS changes,
which could be helpful to have.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-26 21:15 Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Eric Anholt
2015-12-26 21:15 ` Eric Anholt
2016-01-04 7:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-04 7:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-05 20:06 ` Eric Anholt
2016-01-05 20:06 ` Eric Anholt
2016-01-05 20:09 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2016-01-05 20:09 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-01-05 20:22 ` Stephen Warren
2016-01-05 20:22 ` Stephen Warren
2016-01-05 21:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-05 21:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-05 22:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-05 22:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-05 22:52 ` Stephen Warren
2016-01-05 22:52 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568C2316.8030302@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.