[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 3/9] armv8: Add Secure Monitor/Hypervisor Call (SMC/HVC) infrastructure

[Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>]

On 7.1.2016 17:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:06:55PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 6.1.2016 14:04, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
>>> On 14.10.2015 18:55, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
>>>> This commit adds functions issuing calls to secure monitor or
>>>> hypervisore. This allows using services such as Power State
>>>> Coordination Interface (PSCI) provided by firmware, e.g. ARM
>>>> Trusted Firmware (ATF)
>>>
>>>> The SMC call can destroy all registers declared temporary by the
>>>> calling conventions. The clobber list is "x0..x17" because of
>>>> this
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rchintakuntla@cavium.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>>>
>>> +1 (I may need it as well)
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Tested on: Hikey
>>> Methodology:
>>>
>>> Hacked smc handler in arm trusted firmware (x0=x0+x1, x1=x2+x3, x2=x4+x5, x3=x6+2)
>>> +new u-boot command (smc/hvc) using functions from this patch;
>>>
>>> I didn't tested hvc code (would need to make some fake hypervisor), but it's basically the same.
>>>
>>> Idea: perhaps after this series is merged we can add 2 new commands to u-boot (SMC/HVC) to 
>>> play with hypervisors/secure monitors (and perhaps use some simple functionality if needed).
>>
>> How this should look like?
>>
>> Definitely I would like to see this code in mainline because we have
>> code which needs to call SMCs.
> 
> I guess the answer is we either need the cavium board series re-posted
> without the device-tree binding change that is causing consternation
> elsewhere or come up with something else there, or I just pull parts of
> the series.  I'm not quite sure which is best at this point..

This patch can go standalone I believe. Should it go via Albert or
directly through you?
I think that make sense to add it in merge window.
I am happy to test it on zynqmp.

Thanks,
Michal