From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: asm9260: remove __init and __exit annotations
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:35:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568FC941.1000307@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24150770.U3pBDPnky8@wuerfel>
On 01/08/2016 02:59 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The probe and release functions in this driver are marked
> as __init and __exit, but this is wrong as indicated by this
> Kbuild error message:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x1d2308): Section mismatch in reference from the variable asm9260_wdt_driver to the function .init.text:asm9260_wdt_probe()
>
> This removes the annotations, to make the sysfs unbind attribute
> and deferred probing work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: aae03dc98177 ("watchdog: add Alphascale asm9260-wdt driver")
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c
> index 1c22ff4c523a..c9686b2fdafd 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct watchdog_ops asm9260_wdt_ops = {
> .set_timeout = asm9260_wdt_settimeout,
> };
>
> -static int __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_clks(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> +static int asm9260_wdt_get_dt_clks(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> {
> int err;
> unsigned long clk;
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_clks(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_mode(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> +static void asm9260_wdt_get_dt_mode(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> {
> const char *tmp;
> int ret;
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static void __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_mode(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> tmp);
> }
>
> -static int __init asm9260_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int asm9260_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv;
> struct watchdog_device *wdd;
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void asm9260_wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> asm9260_wdt_disable(&priv->wdd);
> }
>
> -static int __exit asm9260_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int asm9260_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: asm9260: remove __init and __exit annotations
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:35:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568FC941.1000307@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24150770.U3pBDPnky8@wuerfel>
On 01/08/2016 02:59 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The probe and release functions in this driver are marked
> as __init and __exit, but this is wrong as indicated by this
> Kbuild error message:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x1d2308): Section mismatch in reference from the variable asm9260_wdt_driver to the function .init.text:asm9260_wdt_probe()
>
> This removes the annotations, to make the sysfs unbind attribute
> and deferred probing work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: aae03dc98177 ("watchdog: add Alphascale asm9260-wdt driver")
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c
> index 1c22ff4c523a..c9686b2fdafd 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/asm9260_wdt.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct watchdog_ops asm9260_wdt_ops = {
> .set_timeout = asm9260_wdt_settimeout,
> };
>
> -static int __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_clks(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> +static int asm9260_wdt_get_dt_clks(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> {
> int err;
> unsigned long clk;
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_clks(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_mode(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> +static void asm9260_wdt_get_dt_mode(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> {
> const char *tmp;
> int ret;
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static void __init asm9260_wdt_get_dt_mode(struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv)
> tmp);
> }
>
> -static int __init asm9260_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int asm9260_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv;
> struct watchdog_device *wdd;
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void asm9260_wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> asm9260_wdt_disable(&priv->wdd);
> }
>
> -static int __exit asm9260_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int asm9260_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct asm9260_wdt_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-08 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-08 10:59 [PATCH] watchdog: asm9260: remove __init and __exit annotations Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-08 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-08 14:35 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-01-08 14:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-01-11 21:53 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568FC941.1000307@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.