From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Tuan Phan <tphan@apm.com>
Cc: Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>,
dougthompson@xmission.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
mchehab@osg.samsung.com,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
patches@apm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:32:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569554D0.2000406@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGDN=zYVvU9=Qj8_szqYW3qh7G=phr_Bc_dm8+KVO=yhp=YTVQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/01/16 19:13, Tuan Phan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 07/11/15 00:51, Loc Ho wrote:
>>> The function acpi_gsi_to_irq should returns 0 on success as upper function
>>> caller expect an 0 for sucesss.
>>
>> I have to ask: why do you feel the need to change an API that behaves
>> like the rest of the IRQ allocation functions (at least when it comes to
>> its return value)?
>>
>> 0 is defined as an invalid interrupt, and I wish it stayed that way.
>
> The upper caller expects 0 for success.
> In drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:
> case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL:
> /* External interrupt vector is GSI */
> rc = acpi_gsi_to_irq(generic->notify.vector, &ghes->irq);
> if (rc) {
> pr_err(GHES_PFX "Failed to map GSI to IRQ for
> generic hardware error source: %d\n",
> generic->header.source_id);
> goto err_edac_unreg;
> }
>
> Also the implementation of acpi_gsi_to_irq for X86 in
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c also return 0 for success and -1 for
> failure.
> int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irqp)
> {
> int rc, irq, trigger, polarity;
>
> if (acpi_irq_model == ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PIC) {
> *irqp = gsi;
> return 0;
> }
>
> rc = acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, &trigger, &polarity);
> if (rc == 0) {
> trigger = trigger ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
> polarity = polarity ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, gsi, trigger, polarity);
> if (irq >= 0) {
> *irqp = irq;
> return 0;
> }
> }
>
> return -1;
> }
>
Right. In which case please document this properly in the commit log.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:32:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569554D0.2000406@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGDN=zYVvU9=Qj8_szqYW3qh7G=phr_Bc_dm8+KVO=yhp=YTVQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/01/16 19:13, Tuan Phan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 07/11/15 00:51, Loc Ho wrote:
>>> The function acpi_gsi_to_irq should returns 0 on success as upper function
>>> caller expect an 0 for sucesss.
>>
>> I have to ask: why do you feel the need to change an API that behaves
>> like the rest of the IRQ allocation functions (at least when it comes to
>> its return value)?
>>
>> 0 is defined as an invalid interrupt, and I wish it stayed that way.
>
> The upper caller expects 0 for success.
> In drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:
> case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL:
> /* External interrupt vector is GSI */
> rc = acpi_gsi_to_irq(generic->notify.vector, &ghes->irq);
> if (rc) {
> pr_err(GHES_PFX "Failed to map GSI to IRQ for
> generic hardware error source: %d\n",
> generic->header.source_id);
> goto err_edac_unreg;
> }
>
> Also the implementation of acpi_gsi_to_irq for X86 in
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c also return 0 for success and -1 for
> failure.
> int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irqp)
> {
> int rc, irq, trigger, polarity;
>
> if (acpi_irq_model == ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PIC) {
> *irqp = gsi;
> return 0;
> }
>
> rc = acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, &trigger, &polarity);
> if (rc == 0) {
> trigger = trigger ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
> polarity = polarity ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, gsi, trigger, polarity);
> if (irq >= 0) {
> *irqp = irq;
> return 0;
> }
> }
>
> return -1;
> }
>
Right. In which case please document this properly in the commit log.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-12 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-07 0:51 [PATCH v3 0/2] acpi: apei: Bug fix to enable APEI support for ARMv8 Loc Ho
2015-11-07 0:51 ` Loc Ho
2015-11-07 0:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq Loc Ho
2015-11-07 0:51 ` Loc Ho
2016-01-10 11:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-10 11:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-11 22:04 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-11 22:04 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-11 22:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-11 22:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-11 22:41 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-11 22:41 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-12 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-12 18:26 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 18:26 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 18:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-12 18:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-12 18:46 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 18:46 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 19:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-12 19:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-12 18:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-12 18:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-12 19:13 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 19:13 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 19:32 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2016-01-12 19:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-12 20:01 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-12 20:01 ` Tuan Phan
2016-01-13 8:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-01-13 8:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-07 0:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] acpi: apei: Enable APEI multiple GHES source to share an single external IRQ Loc Ho
2015-11-07 0:51 ` Loc Ho
2016-01-09 0:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] acpi: apei: Bug fix to enable APEI support for ARMv8 Loc Ho
2016-01-09 0:30 ` Loc Ho
2016-01-10 11:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-10 11:08 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569554D0.2000406@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=lho@apm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=patches@apm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=tphan@apm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.