Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra: Use definition for pll_u override bit

[Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>]

On 1/13/2016 11:08 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> 
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:56:32PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The definition, PLLU_BASE_OVERRIDE, for the pll_u OVERRIDE bit is defined
>> but not used and when the OVERRIDE bit is cleared in tegra210_pll_init()
>> the code directly uses the bit number. Therefore, use the definition,
>> PLLU_BASE_OVERRIDE when clearing the OVERRIDE bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
>> index 791215747863..6f043c5e2394 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
>> @@ -2520,7 +2520,7 @@ static void __init tegra210_pll_init(void __iomem *clk_base,
>>  
>>  	/* PLLU_VCO */
>>  	val = readl(clk_base + pll_u_vco_params.base_reg);
>> -	val &= ~BIT(24); /* disable PLLU_OVERRIDE */
>> +	val &= ~PLLU_BASE_OVERRIDE; /* disable PLLU_OVERRIDE */
>>  	writel(val, clk_base + pll_u_vco_params.base_reg);
>>  
>>  	clk = tegra_clk_register_pllre("pll_u_vco", "pll_ref", clk_base, pmc,
> 
> I think the comment is now redundant, given that the code says pretty
> much the same thing. No need to respin for that, I can remove the
> comment when I apply the patch. That is, unless anyone feels strongly
> about keeping the comment.

I agree its redundant. If I am going to post a new version to address
other concerns, I can just roll this in while doing so.

-rhyland


-- 
nvpublic