From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz, khilman@kernel.org,
aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com,
patrikbachan@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: add a verbose print to enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:09:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569796EE.7030506@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160114120706.GA12774@earth>
Hi,
On Thursday 14 January 2016 05:37 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:45:20PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Since v4.3+, CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS should be enabled (for platforms that
>> have PBIAS regulator) in order for MMC1 to work.
>>
>> Add a more verbose print to help enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS for users
>> using a olddefconfig or a custom .config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> index 7fb0753..7086bd6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> @@ -503,8 +503,11 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_reg_get(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host)
>> host->pbias = devm_regulator_get_optional(host->dev, "pbias");
>> if (IS_ERR(host->pbias)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(host->pbias);
>> - if ((ret != -ENODEV) && host->dev->of_node)
>> + if ((ret != -ENODEV) && host->dev->of_node) {
>> + dev_err(host->dev,
>> + "SD card detect fail? enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS\n");
>> return ret;
>> + }
>> dev_dbg(host->dev, "unable to get pbias regulator %ld\n",
>> PTR_ERR(host->pbias));
>> host->pbias = NULL;
>
>
> Is there a good reason against adding "depends on REGULATOR_PBIAS"
> to MMC_OMAP_HS? I guess it's required for most systems and the regulator
> driver is just 250 loc. I am aware, that this will disable the
> hsmmc driver for 'make oldconfig', but I guess that will be noticed
> in a similar way your warning is noticed.
hmm.. only MMC1 requires PBIAS so I'm not sure if it's okay to add depends on
REGULATOR_PBIAS for the HSMMC driver as such. And as you said it'll also
disable the hsmmc driver if oldconfig is used. But do we get a warning?
Thanks
Kishon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kishon@ti.com (Kishon Vijay Abraham I)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: add a verbose print to enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:09:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569796EE.7030506@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160114120706.GA12774@earth>
Hi,
On Thursday 14 January 2016 05:37 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:45:20PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Since v4.3+, CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS should be enabled (for platforms that
>> have PBIAS regulator) in order for MMC1 to work.
>>
>> Add a more verbose print to help enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS for users
>> using a olddefconfig or a custom .config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> index 7fb0753..7086bd6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> @@ -503,8 +503,11 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_reg_get(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host)
>> host->pbias = devm_regulator_get_optional(host->dev, "pbias");
>> if (IS_ERR(host->pbias)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(host->pbias);
>> - if ((ret != -ENODEV) && host->dev->of_node)
>> + if ((ret != -ENODEV) && host->dev->of_node) {
>> + dev_err(host->dev,
>> + "SD card detect fail? enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS\n");
>> return ret;
>> + }
>> dev_dbg(host->dev, "unable to get pbias regulator %ld\n",
>> PTR_ERR(host->pbias));
>> host->pbias = NULL;
>
>
> Is there a good reason against adding "depends on REGULATOR_PBIAS"
> to MMC_OMAP_HS? I guess it's required for most systems and the regulator
> driver is just 250 loc. I am aware, that this will disable the
> hsmmc driver for 'make oldconfig', but I guess that will be noticed
> in a similar way your warning is noticed.
hmm.. only MMC1 requires PBIAS so I'm not sure if it's okay to add depends on
REGULATOR_PBIAS for the HSMMC driver as such. And as you said it'll also
disable the hsmmc driver if oldconfig is used. But do we get a warning?
Thanks
Kishon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
<pavel@ucw.cz>, <khilman@kernel.org>, <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
<ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>, <patrikbachan@gmail.com>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
<linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: add a verbose print to enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:09:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569796EE.7030506@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160114120706.GA12774@earth>
Hi,
On Thursday 14 January 2016 05:37 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:45:20PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Since v4.3+, CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS should be enabled (for platforms that
>> have PBIAS regulator) in order for MMC1 to work.
>>
>> Add a more verbose print to help enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS for users
>> using a olddefconfig or a custom .config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> index 7fb0753..7086bd6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>> @@ -503,8 +503,11 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_reg_get(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host)
>> host->pbias = devm_regulator_get_optional(host->dev, "pbias");
>> if (IS_ERR(host->pbias)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(host->pbias);
>> - if ((ret != -ENODEV) && host->dev->of_node)
>> + if ((ret != -ENODEV) && host->dev->of_node) {
>> + dev_err(host->dev,
>> + "SD card detect fail? enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS\n");
>> return ret;
>> + }
>> dev_dbg(host->dev, "unable to get pbias regulator %ld\n",
>> PTR_ERR(host->pbias));
>> host->pbias = NULL;
>
>
> Is there a good reason against adding "depends on REGULATOR_PBIAS"
> to MMC_OMAP_HS? I guess it's required for most systems and the regulator
> driver is just 250 loc. I am aware, that this will disable the
> hsmmc driver for 'make oldconfig', but I guess that will be noticed
> in a similar way your warning is noticed.
hmm.. only MMC1 requires PBIAS so I'm not sure if it's okay to add depends on
REGULATOR_PBIAS for the HSMMC driver as such. And as you said it'll also
disable the hsmmc driver if oldconfig is used. But do we get a warning?
Thanks
Kishon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-14 9:15 [PATCH] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: add a verbose print to enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 9:15 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 9:15 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 12:07 ` Sebastian Reichel
2016-01-14 12:07 ` Sebastian Reichel
2016-01-14 12:39 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2016-01-14 12:39 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 12:39 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-14 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-14 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-14 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-14 22:40 ` Sebastian Reichel
2016-01-14 22:40 ` Sebastian Reichel
2016-01-15 9:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-15 9:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-15 16:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-15 16:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-27 14:15 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-01-27 14:15 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569796EE.7030506@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=patrikbachan@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.