All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: PPC: New capability to control MCE behaviour
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:40:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A37200.3030402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160123102013.GA11916@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com>



On Saturday 23 January 2016 03:50 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:37:59PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>> This patch introduces a new KVM capability to control
>> how KVM behaves on machine check exception (MCE).
>> Without this capability, KVM redirects machine check
>> exceptions to guest's 0x200 vector if the address in
>> error belongs to the guest. With this capability KVM
>> causes a guest exit with NMI exit reason.
>>
>> This is required to avoid problems if a new kernel/KVM
>> is used with an old QEMU for guests that don't issue
>> "ibm,nmi-register". As old QEMU does not understand the
>> NMI exit type, it treats it as a fatal error. However,
>> the guest could have handled the machine check error
>> if the exception was delivered to guest's 0x200 interrupt
>> vector instead of NMI exit in case of old QEMU.
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> @@ -1132,6 +1135,10 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  		break;
>>  	}
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_XICS */
>> +	case KVM_CAP_PPC_FWNMI:
>> +		r = 0;
>> +		vcpu->kvm->arch.fwnmi_enabled = true;
>> +		break;
> 
> Might we ever want to set this flag back to false after setting it to
> true?  If so perhaps we should do vcpu->kvm->arch.fwnmi_enabled > !!cap->args[0].  However, I admit I can't actually think of a
> situation where we would need to reset it. :)

Even I am not able to think of any situation where resetting is required.

Regards,
Aravinda

> 
> Paul.
> 

-- 
Regards,
Aravinda


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: PPC: New capability to control MCE behaviour
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:58:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A37200.3030402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160123102013.GA11916@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com>



On Saturday 23 January 2016 03:50 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:37:59PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>> This patch introduces a new KVM capability to control
>> how KVM behaves on machine check exception (MCE).
>> Without this capability, KVM redirects machine check
>> exceptions to guest's 0x200 vector if the address in
>> error belongs to the guest. With this capability KVM
>> causes a guest exit with NMI exit reason.
>>
>> This is required to avoid problems if a new kernel/KVM
>> is used with an old QEMU for guests that don't issue
>> "ibm,nmi-register". As old QEMU does not understand the
>> NMI exit type, it treats it as a fatal error. However,
>> the guest could have handled the machine check error
>> if the exception was delivered to guest's 0x200 interrupt
>> vector instead of NMI exit in case of old QEMU.
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> @@ -1132,6 +1135,10 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  		break;
>>  	}
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_XICS */
>> +	case KVM_CAP_PPC_FWNMI:
>> +		r = 0;
>> +		vcpu->kvm->arch.fwnmi_enabled = true;
>> +		break;
> 
> Might we ever want to set this flag back to false after setting it to
> true?  If so perhaps we should do vcpu->kvm->arch.fwnmi_enabled =
> !!cap->args[0].  However, I admit I can't actually think of a
> situation where we would need to reset it. :)

Even I am not able to think of any situation where resetting is required.

Regards,
Aravinda

> 
> Paul.
> 

-- 
Regards,
Aravinda

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-23 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-13  7:07 [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: PPC: New capability to control MCE behaviour Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-13  7:19 ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-13  7:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: PPC: Exit guest upon MCE when FWNMI capability is enabled Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-13  7:20   ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-14  0:06   ` David Gibson
2016-01-14  0:06     ` David Gibson
2016-01-23 10:28   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-23 10:28     ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-23 12:53     ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-23 12:53       ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-23 21:24       ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-23 21:24         ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-23 21:24         ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-25  8:39         ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-25  8:51           ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-27  5:02         ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2016-01-27  5:14           ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2016-01-27  5:02           ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2016-06-20  5:18   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-06-20  5:18     ` Paul Mackerras
2016-06-20  5:18     ` Paul Mackerras
2016-06-21 21:01     ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-06-21 21:13       ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: PPC: New capability to control MCE behaviour David Gibson
2016-01-14  0:02   ` David Gibson
2016-01-14  0:05   ` David Gibson
2016-01-14  0:05     ` David Gibson
2016-01-23 10:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-23 10:20   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-23 12:28   ` Aravinda Prasad [this message]
2016-01-23 12:40     ` Aravinda Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A37200.3030402@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.