From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
jsnow@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/13] block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:02:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A79883.3040703@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453270306-16608-6-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
On 20.01.2016 09:11, Fam Zheng wrote:
> HBitmap is an implementation detail of block dirty bitmap that should be hidden
> from users. Introduce a BdrvDirtyBitmapIter to encapsulate the underlying
> HBitmapIter.
>
> A small difference in the interface is, before, an HBitmapIter is initialized
> in place, now the new BdrvDirtyBitmapIter must be dynamically allocated because
> the structure definition is in block.c.
>
> Two current users are converted too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/backup.c | 14 ++++++++------
> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> block/mirror.c | 14 ++++++++------
> include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 7 +++++--
> include/qemu/typedefs.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> index 56ddec0..2388039 100644
> --- a/block/backup.c
> +++ b/block/backup.c
> @@ -326,14 +326,14 @@ static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
> int64_t end;
> int64_t last_cluster = -1;
> BlockDriverState *bs = job->common.bs;
> - HBitmapIter hbi;
> + BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *dbi;
>
> granularity = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(job->sync_bitmap);
> clusters_per_iter = MAX((granularity / BACKUP_CLUSTER_SIZE), 1);
> - bdrv_dirty_iter_init(job->sync_bitmap, &hbi);
> + dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(job->sync_bitmap, 0);
>
> /* Find the next dirty sector(s) */
> - while ((sector = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi)) != -1) {
> + while ((sector = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(dbi)) != -1) {
> cluster = sector / BACKUP_SECTORS_PER_CLUSTER;
>
> /* Fake progress updates for any clusters we skipped */
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
> for (end = cluster + clusters_per_iter; cluster < end; cluster++) {
> do {
> if (yield_and_check(job)) {
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
> }
> ret = backup_do_cow(bs, cluster * BACKUP_SECTORS_PER_CLUSTER,
> BACKUP_SECTORS_PER_CLUSTER, &error_is_read,
> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
> if ((ret < 0) &&
> backup_error_action(job, error_is_read, -ret) ==
> BLOCK_ERROR_ACTION_REPORT) {
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
> }
> } while (ret < 0);
> }
> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
> /* If the bitmap granularity is smaller than the backup granularity,
> * we need to advance the iterator pointer to the next cluster. */
> if (granularity < BACKUP_CLUSTER_SIZE) {
> - bdrv_set_dirty_iter(&hbi, cluster * BACKUP_SECTORS_PER_CLUSTER);
> + bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, cluster * BACKUP_SECTORS_PER_CLUSTER);
> }
>
> last_cluster = cluster - 1;
> @@ -373,6 +373,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
> job->common.offset += ((end - last_cluster - 1) * BACKUP_CLUSTER_SIZE);
> }
>
> +out:
> + bdrv_dirty_iter_free(dbi);
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> index 7924c38..bd7758b 100644
> --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> @@ -41,9 +41,15 @@ struct BdrvDirtyBitmap {
> char *name; /* Optional non-empty unique ID */
> int64_t size; /* Size of the bitmap (Number of sectors) */
> bool disabled; /* Bitmap is read-only */
> + int active_iterators; /* How many iterators are active */
> QLIST_ENTRY(BdrvDirtyBitmap) list;
> };
>
> +struct BdrvDirtyBitmapIter {
> + HBitmapIter hbi;
> + BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap;
> +};
> +
> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bdrv_find_dirty_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *name)
> {
> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm;
> @@ -211,6 +217,7 @@ void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs)
>
> QLIST_FOREACH(bitmap, &bs->dirty_bitmaps, list) {
> assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_frozen(bitmap));
> + assert(!bitmap->active_iterators);
> hbitmap_truncate(bitmap->bitmap, size);
> bitmap->size = size;
> }
> @@ -221,6 +228,7 @@ void bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm, *next;
> QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(bm, &bs->dirty_bitmaps, list, next) {
> if (bm == bitmap) {
> + assert(!bitmap->active_iterators);
> assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_frozen(bm));
> QLIST_REMOVE(bitmap, list);
> hbitmap_free(bitmap->bitmap);
> @@ -299,9 +307,29 @@ uint32_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
> return BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE << hbitmap_granularity(bitmap->bitmap);
> }
>
> -void bdrv_dirty_iter_init(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, HBitmapIter *hbi)
> +BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> + uint64_t first_sector)
> {
> - hbitmap_iter_init(hbi, bitmap->bitmap, 0);
> + BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter = g_new(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter, 1);
> + hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, bitmap->bitmap, first_sector);
> + iter->bitmap = bitmap;
> + bitmap->active_iterators++;
> + return iter;
> +}
> +
> +void bdrv_dirty_iter_free(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter)
> +{
> + if (!iter) {
> + return;
> + }
> + assert(iter->bitmap->active_iterators > 0);
> + iter->bitmap->active_iterators--;
> + g_free(iter);
> +}
> +
> +int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter)
> +{
> + return hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi);
> }
>
> void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> @@ -354,10 +382,9 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t cur_sector,
> /**
> * Advance an HBitmapIter to an arbitrary offset.
fix comment.
> */
> -void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(HBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t offset)
> +void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter, int64_t sector_num)
> {
> - assert(hbi->hb);
> - hbitmap_iter_init(hbi, hbi->hb, offset);
> + hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, iter->bitmap->bitmap, sector_num);
why? The old way works for meta iters. The new code - doesn't. I suppose
assert(iter->hbi.hb);
hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, iter->hbi.hb, sector_num);
> }
>
> int64_t bdrv_get_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
> diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
> index f201f2b..70ca844 100644
> --- a/block/mirror.c
> +++ b/block/mirror.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ typedef struct MirrorBlockJob {
> int64_t bdev_length;
> unsigned long *cow_bitmap;
> BdrvDirtyBitmap *dirty_bitmap;
> - HBitmapIter hbi;
> + BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *dbi;
> uint8_t *buf;
> QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, MirrorBuffer) buf_free;
> int buf_free_count;
> @@ -170,10 +170,11 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s)
>
> max_iov = MIN(source->bl.max_iov, s->target->bl.max_iov);
>
> - s->sector_num = hbitmap_iter_next(&s->hbi);
> + s->sector_num = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi);
> if (s->sector_num < 0) {
> - bdrv_dirty_iter_init(s->dirty_bitmap, &s->hbi);
> - s->sector_num = hbitmap_iter_next(&s->hbi);
> + bdrv_dirty_iter_free(s->dbi);
> + s->dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(s->dirty_bitmap, 0);
> + s->sector_num = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi);
> trace_mirror_restart_iter(s, bdrv_get_dirty_count(s->dirty_bitmap));
> assert(s->sector_num >= 0);
> }
> @@ -291,7 +292,7 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s)
> */
> if (next_sector > hbitmap_next_sector
> && bdrv_get_dirty(source, s->dirty_bitmap, next_sector)) {
> - hbitmap_next_sector = hbitmap_iter_next(&s->hbi);
> + hbitmap_next_sector = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi);
> }
>
> next_sector += sectors_per_chunk;
> @@ -502,7 +503,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn mirror_run(void *opaque)
> }
> }
>
> - bdrv_dirty_iter_init(s->dirty_bitmap, &s->hbi);
> + s->dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(s->dirty_bitmap, 0);
> for (;;) {
> uint64_t delay_ns = 0;
> int64_t cnt;
> @@ -615,6 +616,7 @@ immediate_exit:
> qemu_vfree(s->buf);
> g_free(s->cow_bitmap);
> g_free(s->in_flight_bitmap);
> + bdrv_dirty_iter_free(s->dbi);
> bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap(bs, s->dirty_bitmap);
> if (s->target->blk) {
> blk_iostatus_disable(s->target->blk);
> diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
> index 02a9337..120bac6 100644
> --- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
> +++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
> @@ -35,8 +35,11 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> int64_t cur_sector, int nr_sectors);
> void bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> int64_t cur_sector, int nr_sectors);
> -void bdrv_dirty_iter_init(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, struct HBitmapIter *hbi);
> -void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(struct HBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t offset);
> +BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> + uint64_t first_sector);
> +void bdrv_dirty_iter_free(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter);
> +int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter);
> +void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t sector_num);
> int64_t bdrv_get_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
> void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs);
>
> diff --git a/include/qemu/typedefs.h b/include/qemu/typedefs.h
> index 0cf9d74..a1bdb5a 100644
> --- a/include/qemu/typedefs.h
> +++ b/include/qemu/typedefs.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ typedef struct AioContext AioContext;
> typedef struct AllwinnerAHCIState AllwinnerAHCIState;
> typedef struct AudioState AudioState;
> typedef struct BdrvDirtyBitmap BdrvDirtyBitmap;
> +typedef struct BdrvDirtyBitmapIter BdrvDirtyBitmapIter;
> typedef struct BlockBackend BlockBackend;
> typedef struct BlockBackendRootState BlockBackendRootState;
> typedef struct BlockDriverState BlockDriverState;
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
* now, @virtuozzo.com instead of @parallels.com. Sorry for this inconvenience.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-26 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 6:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] Dirty bitmap changes for migration/persistence work Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/13] backup: Use Bitmap to replace "s->bitmap" Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/13] typedefs: Add BdrvDirtyBitmap Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 16:56 ` Eric Blake
2016-01-21 3:05 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-25 20:37 ` John Snow
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/13] block: Move block dirty bitmap code to separate files Fam Zheng
2016-01-22 9:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/13] block: Remove unused typedef of BlockDriverDirtyHandler Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/13] block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface Fam Zheng
2016-01-26 16:02 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2016-02-27 8:30 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/13] HBitmap: Introduce "meta" bitmap to track bit changes Fam Zheng
2016-01-25 22:02 ` John Snow
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/13] tests: Add test code for meta bitmap Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/13] block: Support meta dirty bitmap Fam Zheng
2016-01-22 11:34 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-26 4:31 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-22 11:58 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-22 12:05 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-26 6:25 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-26 7:49 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-26 8:23 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-25 22:16 ` John Snow
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/13] block: Add two dirty bitmap getters Fam Zheng
2016-01-22 11:45 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-26 4:19 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/13] block: Assert that bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap succeeded Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/13] hbitmap: serialization Fam Zheng
2016-01-26 17:01 ` John Snow
2016-02-27 8:55 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/13] block: BdrvDirtyBitmap serialization interface Fam Zheng
2016-01-26 17:07 ` John Snow
2016-01-20 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 13/13] tests: Add test code for hbitmap serialization Fam Zheng
2016-01-26 17:10 ` John Snow
2016-01-20 16:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] Dirty bitmap changes for migration/persistence work Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-22 12:07 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-21 10:41 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-21 13:03 ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-26 7:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 14/13] block: More operations for meta dirty bitmap Fam Zheng
2016-01-27 14:57 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-02-27 8:35 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A79883.3040703@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.