All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 net-next] ravb: Add dma queue interrupt support
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:50:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AA38C5.6070004@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127014944.GD27499@verge.net.au>

Hello.

On 01/27/2016 04:49 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@renesas.com>

    Kaneko-san, with the amount of the review changes, it might make sense for 
you to assume the authorship of this patch, only noting it's based on 
Mizuguchi-san's work. In principle, when you change the original patch, you 
should document the changes you made in the change log, above ---...

>>>> This patch supports the following interrupts.
>>>>
>>>> - One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
>>>> - One interrupt for emac
>>>> - Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx)
>>>>
>>>> This patch improve efficiency of the interrupt handler by adding the
>>>> interrupt handler corresponding to each interrupt source described
>>>> above. Additionally, it reduces the number of times of the access to
>>>> EthernetAVB IF.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@renesas.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I have tested this patch and the result seems positive.
>>
>>     Tested on gen3 only I guess?
>
> Yes, that is correct.
>
>>> Please let me know if any more/different testing would help.
>>
>>     Sanity testing on some gen2 SoC wouldn't hurt (if you have time).
>
> I don't believe that I have access to a gen2 board (+ extra hardware ?)
> where ravb works.

    Sorry, I just forgot about that.

> If you do would it be possible for you to do a sanity test?

    Yes, of course.

MBR, Sergei


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 net-next] ravb: Add dma queue interrupt support
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:50:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AA38C5.6070004@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127014944.GD27499@verge.net.au>

Hello.

On 01/27/2016 04:49 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@renesas.com>

    Kaneko-san, with the amount of the review changes, it might make sense for 
you to assume the authorship of this patch, only noting it's based on 
Mizuguchi-san's work. In principle, when you change the original patch, you 
should document the changes you made in the change log, above ---...

>>>> This patch supports the following interrupts.
>>>>
>>>> - One interrupt for multiple (descriptor, error, management)
>>>> - One interrupt for emac
>>>> - Four interrupts for dma queue (best effort rx/tx, network control rx/tx)
>>>>
>>>> This patch improve efficiency of the interrupt handler by adding the
>>>> interrupt handler corresponding to each interrupt source described
>>>> above. Additionally, it reduces the number of times of the access to
>>>> EthernetAVB IF.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@renesas.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I have tested this patch and the result seems positive.
>>
>>     Tested on gen3 only I guess?
>
> Yes, that is correct.
>
>>> Please let me know if any more/different testing would help.
>>
>>     Sanity testing on some gen2 SoC wouldn't hurt (if you have time).
>
> I don't believe that I have access to a gen2 board (+ extra hardware ?)
> where ravb works.

    Sorry, I just forgot about that.

> If you do would it be possible for you to do a sanity test?

    Yes, of course.

MBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-24 15:52 [PATCH/RFC v4 net-next] ravb: Add dma queue interrupt support Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-01-24 15:52 ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-01-26  0:23 ` Simon Horman
2016-01-26  0:23   ` Simon Horman
2016-01-26 19:00   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-26 19:00     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-27  1:49     ` Simon Horman
2016-01-27  1:49       ` Simon Horman
2016-01-28 15:50       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2016-01-28 15:50         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 18:36         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 18:36           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 16:48 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 16:48   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 16:50   ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-07 16:50     ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-07 17:09     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 17:09       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-08 17:19       ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-08 17:19         ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-21 15:42         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-21 15:42           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-21 19:16           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-21 19:16             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-25 22:22             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-25 22:22               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 17:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 17:32   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 16:56   ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-07 16:56     ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-07 17:18     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 17:18       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 17:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-01-28 17:51   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-02-07 17:18   ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2016-02-07 17:18     ` Yoshihiro Kaneko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56AA38C5.6070004@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ykaneko0929@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.