All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"dvhart@linux.intel.com" <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"acme@redhat.com" <acme@redhat.com>,
	"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"noamc@ezchip.com" <noamc@ezchip.com>,
	"dsahern@gmail.com" <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	"giladb@ezchip.com" <giladb@ezchip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:43:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B2CFF2.4030503@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454516455.2811.4.camel__10775.5710989752$1454516490$gmane$org@synopsys.com>

+CC Noam

On Wednesday 03 February 2016 09:50 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> I agree with the current solution to add -atomic to for arc700 builds.
>> > Although making that default for arc700 tools will be better but that will not fix
>> > things before next release of tools etc.
>> > 
>> > But we *do* need to improve generic solution
>> > 1. Add atomics detection in perf to add fall back arch stubs
>> > 2. ARC needs to add syscall for facilitating atomic r-m-w !
> So the most recent ARC GNU tools (2015.12) were just released yesterday
> and still atomics are disabled by default for ARCv1.
> That means perf will continue to fail on building for now.
> 
> Do you think we may apply my initial fix to 4.5 while it is in development and
> then to stable trees as well?

Noam, what's the atomic story for EZChip. Do you support such things for user
space in GNU tools. If -atomic is added to perf user space builds are you guys OK!

-Vineet

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:43:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B2CFF2.4030503@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454516455.2811.4.camel__10775.5710989752$1454516490$gmane$org@synopsys.com>

+CC Noam

On Wednesday 03 February 2016 09:50 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> I agree with the current solution to add -atomic to for arc700 builds.
>> > Although making that default for arc700 tools will be better but that will not fix
>> > things before next release of tools etc.
>> > 
>> > But we *do* need to improve generic solution
>> > 1. Add atomics detection in perf to add fall back arch stubs
>> > 2. ARC needs to add syscall for facilitating atomic r-m-w !
> So the most recent ARC GNU tools (2015.12) were just released yesterday
> and still atomics are disabled by default for ARCv1.
> That means perf will continue to fail on building for now.
> 
> Do you think we may apply my initial fix to 4.5 while it is in development and
> then to stable trees as well?

Noam, what's the atomic story for EZChip. Do you support such things for user
space in GNU tools. If -atomic is added to perf user space builds are you guys OK!

-Vineet

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
	Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Cc: "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"dvhart@linux.intel.com" <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"acme@redhat.com" <acme@redhat.com>,
	"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"noamc@ezchip.com" <noamc@ezchip.com>,
	"dsahern@gmail.com" <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	"giladb@ezchip.com" <giladb@ezchip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:43:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B2CFF2.4030503@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454516455.2811.4.camel__10775.5710989752$1454516490$gmane$org@synopsys.com>

+CC Noam

On Wednesday 03 February 2016 09:50 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> I agree with the current solution to add -atomic to for arc700 builds.
>> > Although making that default for arc700 tools will be better but that will not fix
>> > things before next release of tools etc.
>> > 
>> > But we *do* need to improve generic solution
>> > 1. Add atomics detection in perf to add fall back arch stubs
>> > 2. ARC needs to add syscall for facilitating atomic r-m-w !
> So the most recent ARC GNU tools (2015.12) were just released yesterday
> and still atomics are disabled by default for ARCv1.
> That means perf will continue to fail on building for now.
> 
> Do you think we may apply my initial fix to 4.5 while it is in development and
> then to stable trees as well?

Noam, what's the atomic story for EZChip. Do you support such things for user
space in GNU tools. If -atomic is added to perf user space builds are you guys OK!

-Vineet

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1445088959-3058-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com>
2015-10-17 14:19 ` [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta
2015-10-18 11:15   ` Alexey Brodkin
2015-10-18 11:15     ` Alexey Brodkin
2015-10-18 23:14     ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-18 23:14       ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-19  4:58       ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-19  5:49         ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-19  5:49           ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-19  9:28           ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-19  9:35             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-19  9:46               ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-19  9:51                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-19 10:04                   ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-20  8:00                   ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-20 10:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-20 10:45                       ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-29 15:58                         ` Alexey Brodkin
2015-10-29 15:58                           ` Alexey Brodkin
2015-10-29 15:58                           ` Alexey Brodkin
2015-10-30  6:19                           ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-30  6:19                             ` Vineet Gupta
2016-02-03 16:20                             ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-02-03 16:20                               ` Alexey Brodkin
     [not found]                             ` <1454516455.2811.4.camel__10775.5710989752$1454516490$gmane$org@synopsys.com>
2016-02-04  4:13                               ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2016-02-04  4:13                                 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-02-04  4:13                                 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-02-05 11:18                                 ` Noam Camus
2016-02-05 11:18                                   ` Noam Camus
2016-02-05 16:10                                   ` acme
2016-02-05 16:10                                     ` acme
2016-02-10  3:09                                     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-02-10  3:09                                       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-10-18 18:58               ` Vineet Gupta
2016-10-18 18:58                 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-10-24 16:17                 ` [PATCH-v2] ARC: syscall for userspace cmpxchg assist Vineet Gupta
2016-10-24 16:17                   ` Vineet Gupta
2016-11-04 20:16                   ` Vineet Gupta
2016-11-04 20:16                     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-11-07 18:50                     ` [PATCH] ARC: tweak semantics of " Vineet Gupta
2016-11-07 18:50                       ` Vineet Gupta
2015-10-30  6:21 ` [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta
2015-10-30  6:21   ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B2CFF2.4030503@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=giladb@ezchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=noamc@ezchip.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.