Re: Common/typical fractional divider HW API

[Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>]

On 05/02/2016 17:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 17:01 +0100, Mason wrote:
> 
>> So, do you agree that
>>
>>   DIV = 2^I * (1 + F/256)
>>
>> gives a more useful DIV distribution than
>>
>>   DIV = I + F/16
> 
> If you can change hardware why not to use any existing approach which
> suits better to your device?

Sorry, I don't understand the question.

In this part of my message, I was trying to argue that one HW API
"2^I * (1 + F/256)" seemed better than another one "I + F/16" on
any hardware.

> I don't remember any existing, though I didn't check much, divider
> register which takes something like that.

IIUC, you are saying that you've never seen hardware use the
"2^I * (1 + F/256)" formula, is that correct?

>> I'm not sure how to parse that. I'm using the divider driver
>> for a CPU clock, to do D(V)FS in cpufreq.
> 
> If you are using custom stuff for custom hardware, I hope it's okay.
> But if we are talking about generic solutions (like clk-fractional-
> divider), I would suggest to consider existing users / hardware.

Are you saying that I could use the clk-fractional-divider with
hardware that computes "I + F/16" ?

Maybe the clk-fractional-divider could be made more generic by having
the register update part done in a call-back function?

Regards.