All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 21/23] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if running in HYP
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:45:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B8C638.2010402@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160208155625.GQ6076@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 08/02/16 15:56, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:00:14PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> @@ -76,6 +59,36 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
>>  
>> +#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
>> +#define DBG_SSC_HYP		(3 << 14)
>> +
>> +static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | ctrl.enabled;
>> +
>> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
>> +		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP | DBG_SSC_HYP;
>> +	else
>> +		val |= ctrl.privilege << 1;
>> +
>> +	return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>> +				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
>> +	reg >>= 1;
>> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
>> +		ctrl->privilege = !!(reg & (DBG_HMC_HYP >> 1));
> 
> I don't particularly like this part as it's not clear just by looking at
> the code that it, in fact, generates AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1. I would
> make this clearer:
> 
> 	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && (reg & (DBG_HMC_HYP >> 1)))
> 		ctrl->privilege = AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1;
> 
> Alternatively, you could define the PMC field value as:
> 
> #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2	0
> 
> and change the privilege to EL1 after masking, something like:
> 
> 	ctrl->privilege = reg & 0x3;
> 	if (ctrl->privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2)
> 		ctrl->privilege = AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1;
> 
> BTW, do we need to check is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() when decoding? Is there
> anything else that could have set this SSC/HMC/PMC fields other than
> encode_ctrl_reg()?

I was being overzealous, and your solution is clearly better. I ended up with the following:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index 9732908..c872b2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/virt.h>
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
@@ -35,24 +36,6 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
 };
 
-static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
-{
-	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
-		ctrl.enabled;
-}
-
-static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
-				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
-{
-	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
-	reg >>= 1;
-	ctrl->privilege	= reg & 0x3;
-	reg >>= 2;
-	ctrl->type	= reg & 0x3;
-	reg >>= 2;
-	ctrl->len	= reg & 0xff;
-}
-
 /* Breakpoint */
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE	0
 
@@ -62,6 +45,7 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
 
 /* Privilege Levels */
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2	0
 #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
 #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
 
@@ -76,6 +60,35 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
 #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
 
+#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
+#define DBG_SSC_HYP		(3 << 14)
+
+static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
+{
+	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | ctrl.enabled;
+
+	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
+		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP | DBG_SSC_HYP;
+	else
+		val |= ctrl.privilege << 1;
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
+				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
+	reg >>= 1;
+	ctrl->privilege	= reg & 0x3;
+	if (ctrl->privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2)
+		ctrl->privilege	= AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1;
+	reg >>= 2;
+	ctrl->type	= reg & 0x3;
+	reg >>= 2;
+	ctrl->len	= reg & 0xff;
+}
+
 /*
  * Limits.
  * Changing these will require modifications to the register accessors.

Was that what you had in mind?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 21/23] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if running in HYP
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:45:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B8C638.2010402@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160208155625.GQ6076@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 08/02/16 15:56, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:00:14PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> @@ -76,6 +59,36 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
>>  
>> +#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
>> +#define DBG_SSC_HYP		(3 << 14)
>> +
>> +static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | ctrl.enabled;
>> +
>> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
>> +		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP | DBG_SSC_HYP;
>> +	else
>> +		val |= ctrl.privilege << 1;
>> +
>> +	return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>> +				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
>> +	reg >>= 1;
>> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
>> +		ctrl->privilege = !!(reg & (DBG_HMC_HYP >> 1));
> 
> I don't particularly like this part as it's not clear just by looking at
> the code that it, in fact, generates AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1. I would
> make this clearer:
> 
> 	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && (reg & (DBG_HMC_HYP >> 1)))
> 		ctrl->privilege = AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1;
> 
> Alternatively, you could define the PMC field value as:
> 
> #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2	0
> 
> and change the privilege to EL1 after masking, something like:
> 
> 	ctrl->privilege = reg & 0x3;
> 	if (ctrl->privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2)
> 		ctrl->privilege = AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1;
> 
> BTW, do we need to check is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() when decoding? Is there
> anything else that could have set this SSC/HMC/PMC fields other than
> encode_ctrl_reg()?

I was being overzealous, and your solution is clearly better. I ended up with the following:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index 9732908..c872b2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/virt.h>
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
@@ -35,24 +36,6 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
 };
 
-static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
-{
-	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
-		ctrl.enabled;
-}
-
-static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
-				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
-{
-	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
-	reg >>= 1;
-	ctrl->privilege	= reg & 0x3;
-	reg >>= 2;
-	ctrl->type	= reg & 0x3;
-	reg >>= 2;
-	ctrl->len	= reg & 0xff;
-}
-
 /* Breakpoint */
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE	0
 
@@ -62,6 +45,7 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
 
 /* Privilege Levels */
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2	0
 #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
 #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
 
@@ -76,6 +60,35 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
 #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
 
+#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
+#define DBG_SSC_HYP		(3 << 14)
+
+static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
+{
+	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | ctrl.enabled;
+
+	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
+		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP | DBG_SSC_HYP;
+	else
+		val |= ctrl.privilege << 1;
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
+				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
+	reg >>= 1;
+	ctrl->privilege	= reg & 0x3;
+	if (ctrl->privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2)
+		ctrl->privilege	= AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1;
+	reg >>= 2;
+	ctrl->type	= reg & 0x3;
+	reg >>= 2;
+	ctrl->len	= reg & 0xff;
+}
+
 /*
  * Limits.
  * Changing these will require modifications to the register accessors.

Was that what you had in mind?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03 17:59 [PATCH v3 00/23] arm64: Virtualization Host Extension support Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] arm/arm64: KVM: Add hook for C-based stage2 init Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] arm64: KVM: Switch to " Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] arm/arm64: Add new is_kernel_in_hyp_mode predicate Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-08 14:41   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 14:41     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] arm64: Allow the arch timer to use the HYP timer Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN feature Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-08 14:42   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 14:42     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 14:42     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] arm64: KVM: Skip HYP setup when already running in HYP Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 17:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Patch out use of HVC Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Patch out kern_hyp_va Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Introduce unified system register accessors Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Differenciate host/guest sysreg save/restore Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Split save/restore of registers shared between guest and host Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-04 19:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:15     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:15     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Use unified system register accessors Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Enable minimal sysreg save/restore Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Make __fpsimd_enabled VHE aware Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Implement VHE activate/deactivate_traps Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Use unified sysreg accessors for timer Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Add fpsimd enabling on guest access Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Add alternative panic handling Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] arm64: KVM: Move most of the fault decoding to C Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-04 19:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:20     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:20     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-08 14:44   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 14:44     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] arm64: perf: Count EL2 events if the kernel is running in HYP Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-04 19:23   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:23     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:23     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-05  9:02     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-05  9:02       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-05  9:02       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-08 14:48   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 14:48     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 14:48     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if " Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-08 15:56   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 15:56     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 16:45     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2016-02-08 16:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-08 16:52       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 16:52         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] arm64: VHE: Add support for running Linux in EL2 mode Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-04 19:25   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:25     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:25     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-08 15:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 15:58     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 15:58     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] arm64: Panic when VHE and non VHE CPUs coexist Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-03 18:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-04 19:25   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:25     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-08 16:04   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 16:04     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-08 16:24     ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-08 16:24       ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-08 16:24       ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-09 12:02       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-09 12:02         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-04 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] arm64: Virtualization Host Extension support Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:26   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-04 19:26   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-05  8:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-05  8:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-05  8:56     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B8C638.2010402@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.