From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, david.daney@cavium.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/irq: fix bug in computing output requester-id for an msi-map
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:47:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B928F8.3010104@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454970623-28781-1-git-send-email-stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
On 02/08/2016 02:30 PM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> From: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
>
> The binding for msi-map specifies that the output requester id
> should be computed as: (r - rid-base + msi-base)
>
> ...update the code accordingly.
I agree there is a problem however ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/irq.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
> index 706e3ff..3f5e5fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
> @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ static u32 __of_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, struct device_node **np,
> struct device_node *msi_controller_node;
> struct device_node *msi_np = *np;
> u32 map_mask, masked_rid, rid_base, msi_base, rid_len, phandle;
> + u32 masked_rid_base;
> int msi_map_len;
> bool matched;
> u32 rid_out = rid_in;
> @@ -654,7 +655,8 @@ static u32 __of_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, struct device_node **np,
> if (!matched)
> return rid_out;
>
> - rid_out = masked_rid + msi_base;
> + masked_rid_base = map_mask & rid_base;
... The binding document nowhere, that I see, talks about applying the
mask to the rid-base.
The device tree should already contain the rid-base in the correct range.
If you remove this masking step, I think it may be correct.
If you just do:
diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
index 7ee21ae..92abe01 100644
--- a/drivers/of/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static u32 __of_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev,
struct device_node **np,
if (!matched)
return rid_out;
- rid_out = masked_rid + msi_base;
+ rid_out = msi_base + (masked_rid - rid_base);
dev_dbg(dev,
"msi-map at: %s, using mask %08x, rid-base: %08x,
msi-base: %08x, length: %08x, rid: %08x -> %08x\n",
It think it will be correct.
I have tested it that way. If you do that,
Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> + rid_out = msi_base + (masked_rid - masked_rid_base);
> dev_dbg(dev,
> "msi-map at: %s, using mask %08x, rid-base: %08x, msi-base: %08x, length: %08x, rid: %08x -> %08x\n",
> dev_name(parent_dev), map_mask, rid_base, msi_base,
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
Cc: <robh@kernel.org>, <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
<grant.likely@linaro.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
<david.daney@cavium.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/irq: fix bug in computing output requester-id for an msi-map
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:47:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B928F8.3010104@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454970623-28781-1-git-send-email-stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
On 02/08/2016 02:30 PM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> From: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
>
> The binding for msi-map specifies that the output requester id
> should be computed as: (r - rid-base + msi-base)
>
> ...update the code accordingly.
I agree there is a problem however ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/irq.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
> index 706e3ff..3f5e5fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
> @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ static u32 __of_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, struct device_node **np,
> struct device_node *msi_controller_node;
> struct device_node *msi_np = *np;
> u32 map_mask, masked_rid, rid_base, msi_base, rid_len, phandle;
> + u32 masked_rid_base;
> int msi_map_len;
> bool matched;
> u32 rid_out = rid_in;
> @@ -654,7 +655,8 @@ static u32 __of_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, struct device_node **np,
> if (!matched)
> return rid_out;
>
> - rid_out = masked_rid + msi_base;
> + masked_rid_base = map_mask & rid_base;
... The binding document nowhere, that I see, talks about applying the
mask to the rid-base.
The device tree should already contain the rid-base in the correct range.
If you remove this masking step, I think it may be correct.
If you just do:
diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
index 7ee21ae..92abe01 100644
--- a/drivers/of/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static u32 __of_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev,
struct device_node **np,
if (!matched)
return rid_out;
- rid_out = masked_rid + msi_base;
+ rid_out = msi_base + (masked_rid - rid_base);
dev_dbg(dev,
"msi-map at: %s, using mask %08x, rid-base: %08x,
msi-base: %08x, length: %08x, rid: %08x -> %08x\n",
It think it will be correct.
I have tested it that way. If you do that,
Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> + rid_out = msi_base + (masked_rid - masked_rid_base);
> dev_dbg(dev,
> "msi-map at: %s, using mask %08x, rid-base: %08x, msi-base: %08x, length: %08x, rid: %08x -> %08x\n",
> dev_name(parent_dev), map_mask, rid_base, msi_base,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 22:30 [PATCH] of/irq: fix bug in computing output requester-id for an msi-map Stuart Yoder
2016-02-08 22:30 ` Stuart Yoder
2016-02-08 23:47 ` David Daney [this message]
2016-02-08 23:47 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B928F8.3010104@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.yoder@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.