Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: increase scalability of global memory commitment accounting

[Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>]

On 02/11/2016 03:24 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
>>
>> If a process is unmapping 4MB then it's pretty crazy for us to be
>> hitting the percpu_counter 32 separate times for that single operation.
>>
>> Is there some way in which we can batch up the modifications within the
>> caller and update the counter less frequently?  Perhaps even in a
>> single hit?
> 
> I think the problem is the batch size is too small and we overflow
> the local counter into the global counter for 4M allocations.
> The reason for the small batch size was because we use
> percpu_counter_read_positive in __vm_enough_memory and it is not precise
> and the error could grow with large batch size.
> 
> Let's switch to the precise __percpu_counter_compare that is 
> unaffected by batch size.  It will do precise comparison and only add up
> the local per cpu counters when the global count is not precise
> enough.  
> 

I'm not certain about this. for_each_online_cpu() under spinlock somewhat doubtful.
And if we are close to limit we will be hitting slowpath all the time.


> So maybe something like the following patch with a relaxed batch size.
> I have not tested this patch much other than compiling and booting
> the kernel.  I wonder if this works for Andrey. We could relax the batch
> size further, but that will mean that we will incur the overhead
> of summing the per cpu counters earlier when the global count get close
> to the allowed limit.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Tim
> 
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>