From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: arm qemu test failures due to 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of compatibles'
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:11:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1CE95.6020206@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160215105909.GH12289@pengutronix.de>
On 15/02/16 10:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Guenter,
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:50:10AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Uwe,
>>
>> Your patch 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of
>> compatibles' causes the following qemu tests to crash in -next.
>>
>> arm:vexpress-a9:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>> arm:vexpress-a15:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>>
>> Crash log:
>>
>> VFS: Cannot open root device "mmcblk0" or unknown-block(0,0): error -6
>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
>> 1f00 131072 mtdblock0 (driver?)
>> 1f01 32768 mtdblock1 (driver?)
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
>
> Can you provide a complete boot log? This might already reveal which
> device is failing. It might not be the mmci device but something it
> depends on (clock, bus parent, irq).
FWIW the PL180 on my Juno still works fine with this patch picked on top
of -rc3, so the issue would seem to be something else - From a quick
comparison between the DTs I see a slight difference in compatible
strings for the clocks, but the more likely-looking suspect is that the
VExpress DT references some GPIOs where the Juno DT doesn't.
Robin.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm qemu test failures due to 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of compatibles'
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:11:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1CE95.6020206@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160215105909.GH12289@pengutronix.de>
On 15/02/16 10:59, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hello Guenter,
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:50:10AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Uwe,
>>
>> Your patch 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of
>> compatibles' causes the following qemu tests to crash in -next.
>>
>> arm:vexpress-a9:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>> arm:vexpress-a15:vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>>
>> Crash log:
>>
>> VFS: Cannot open root device "mmcblk0" or unknown-block(0,0): error -6
>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
>> 1f00 131072 mtdblock0 (driver?)
>> 1f01 32768 mtdblock1 (driver?)
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
>
> Can you provide a complete boot log? This might already reveal which
> device is failing. It might not be the mmci device but something it
> depends on (clock, bus parent, irq).
FWIW the PL180 on my Juno still works fine with this patch picked on top
of -rc3, so the issue would seem to be something else - From a quick
comparison between the DTs I see a slight difference in compatible
strings for the clocks, but the more likely-looking suspect is that the
VExpress DT references some GPIOs where the Juno DT doesn't.
Robin.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-14 16:50 arm qemu test failures due to 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of compatibles' Guenter Roeck
2016-02-14 19:55 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-14 19:55 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-14 20:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-14 20:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 8:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 8:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 8:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 8:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 9:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 9:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 10:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 10:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 10:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 10:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-14 21:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-14 21:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-15 7:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 7:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 10:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 10:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 13:11 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2016-02-15 13:11 ` Robin Murphy
2016-02-15 14:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 14:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 16:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 16:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 16:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-15 16:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-15 17:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 17:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 21:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-15 21:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-15 15:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-15 15:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-15 16:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 16:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 17:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 17:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-02-15 18:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-15 18:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-15 18:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-15 18:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-15 17:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-15 17:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-15 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-15 18:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-15 18:15 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C1CE95.6020206@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.