From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Keerthy <a0393675@ti.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
Dmitry Lifshitz <lifshitz@compulab.co.il>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dt list <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:25:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C20A12.8080305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C1F92A.1020803@ti.com>
On 02/15/2016 10:13 AM, Keerthy wrote:
[...]
>>
>> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>>
>> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
>> temperatures.
>>
>> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
>> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
>> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
>> suggestion..
>
> Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
> with one dtsi?
Why would we want to throttle earlier on customer platforms or other
boards using extended? at the very least -> if all upstream boards
have only commercial grade, then just introduce
am57xx-commercial-thermal.dtsi ..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:25:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C20A12.8080305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C1F92A.1020803@ti.com>
On 02/15/2016 10:13 AM, Keerthy wrote:
[...]
>>
>> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>>
>> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
>> temperatures.
>>
>> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
>> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
>> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
>> suggestion..
>
> Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
> with one dtsi?
Why would we want to throttle earlier on customer platforms or other
boards using extended? at the very least -> if all upstream boards
have only commercial grade, then just introduce
am57xx-commercial-thermal.dtsi ..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 9:45 [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds Keerthy
2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
2016-02-09 22:09 ` Eduardo Valentin
2016-02-09 22:09 ` Eduardo Valentin
2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <56BA6530.4030102-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <CAGo_u6r8-LJBWWrew0fV50Q+JnCxDj9PD57+9NoDm5TqCWL=jw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C20A12.8080305@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=a0393675@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=lifshitz@compulab.co.il \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.