All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/23] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if running in HYP
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:55:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C2F21D.90205@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160215190747.GR6298@arm.com>

On 15/02/16 19:07, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:46:56PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 06:40:02PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> With VHE, we place kernel {watch,break}-points at EL2 to get things
>>> like kgdb and "perf -e mem:..." working.
>>>
>>> This requires a bit of repainting in the low-level encore/decode,
>>> but is otherwise pretty simple.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> index 9732908..4d8d5a8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>>  
>>>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>>>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>>> +#include <asm/virt.h>
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>>  
>>> @@ -35,24 +36,6 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
>>>  	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> -static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>>> -{
>>> -	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
>>> -		ctrl.enabled;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>> -				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
>>> -{
>>> -	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
>>> -	reg >>= 1;
>>> -	ctrl->privilege	= reg & 0x3;
>>> -	reg >>= 2;
>>> -	ctrl->type	= reg & 0x3;
>>> -	reg >>= 2;
>>> -	ctrl->len	= reg & 0xff;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  /* Breakpoint */
>>>  #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE	0
>>>  
>>> @@ -62,6 +45,7 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>>  #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
>>>  
>>>  /* Privilege Levels */
>>> +#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2	0
>>>  #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
>>>  #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
>>>  
>>> @@ -76,6 +60,35 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
>>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
>>>  
>>> +#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
>>> +#define DBG_SSC_HYP		(3 << 14)
>>
>> Why do we need to touch the SSC field at all?
>>
>>> +
>>> +static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | ctrl.enabled;
>>> +
>>> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
>>> +		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP | DBG_SSC_HYP | (AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2 << 1);
>>
>> I don't think this is correct. We want to allow, for example, a userspace
>> watchpoint to fire thanks to something like put_user, so the encoding
>> really needs to build up the PMC field (like we do already), then orr in
>> the HMC field.
> 
> Hmm, I got my arm and my arm64 mixed up here. For the latter, we don't
> actually support EL0+EL1 watchpoints, but I still think that the
> {HMC,SSC,PMC} encoding of {1,00,xx} is cleaner.

Indeed. So with that in mind, I ended up with the following patch, which is much simpler than the previous one:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index 9732908..115ea2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/virt.h>
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
@@ -35,10 +36,21 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
 };
 
+/* Privilege Levels */
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
+
+#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
+
 static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
 {
-	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
+	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
 		ctrl.enabled;
+
+	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
+		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP;
+
+	return val;
 }
 
 static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
@@ -61,10 +73,6 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_STORE	2
 #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
 
-/* Privilege Levels */
-#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
-#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
-
 /* Lengths */
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1	0x1
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2	0x3


Thanks,
	
	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 21/23] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if running in HYP
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:55:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C2F21D.90205@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160215190747.GR6298@arm.com>

On 15/02/16 19:07, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:46:56PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 06:40:02PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> With VHE, we place kernel {watch,break}-points at EL2 to get things
>>> like kgdb and "perf -e mem:..." working.
>>>
>>> This requires a bit of repainting in the low-level encore/decode,
>>> but is otherwise pretty simple.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> index 9732908..4d8d5a8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>>  
>>>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>>>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>>> +#include <asm/virt.h>
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>>  
>>> @@ -35,24 +36,6 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
>>>  	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> -static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>>> -{
>>> -	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
>>> -		ctrl.enabled;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>> -				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
>>> -{
>>> -	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
>>> -	reg >>= 1;
>>> -	ctrl->privilege	= reg & 0x3;
>>> -	reg >>= 2;
>>> -	ctrl->type	= reg & 0x3;
>>> -	reg >>= 2;
>>> -	ctrl->len	= reg & 0xff;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  /* Breakpoint */
>>>  #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE	0
>>>  
>>> @@ -62,6 +45,7 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>>  #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
>>>  
>>>  /* Privilege Levels */
>>> +#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2	0
>>>  #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
>>>  #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
>>>  
>>> @@ -76,6 +60,35 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
>>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
>>>  
>>> +#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
>>> +#define DBG_SSC_HYP		(3 << 14)
>>
>> Why do we need to touch the SSC field at all?
>>
>>> +
>>> +static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | ctrl.enabled;
>>> +
>>> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
>>> +		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP | DBG_SSC_HYP | (AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2 << 1);
>>
>> I don't think this is correct. We want to allow, for example, a userspace
>> watchpoint to fire thanks to something like put_user, so the encoding
>> really needs to build up the PMC field (like we do already), then orr in
>> the HMC field.
> 
> Hmm, I got my arm and my arm64 mixed up here. For the latter, we don't
> actually support EL0+EL1 watchpoints, but I still think that the
> {HMC,SSC,PMC} encoding of {1,00,xx} is cleaner.

Indeed. So with that in mind, I ended up with the following patch, which is much simpler than the previous one:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index 9732908..115ea2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/virt.h>
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
@@ -35,10 +36,21 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
 };
 
+/* Privilege Levels */
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
+
+#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
+
 static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
 {
-	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
+	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
 		ctrl.enabled;
+
+	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
+		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP;
+
+	return val;
 }
 
 static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
@@ -61,10 +73,6 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_STORE	2
 #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
 
-/* Privilege Levels */
-#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
-#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
-
 /* Lengths */
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1	0x1
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2	0x3


Thanks,
	
	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/23] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if running in HYP
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:55:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C2F21D.90205@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160215190747.GR6298@arm.com>

On 15/02/16 19:07, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:46:56PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 06:40:02PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> With VHE, we place kernel {watch,break}-points at EL2 to get things
>>> like kgdb and "perf -e mem:..." working.
>>>
>>> This requires a bit of repainting in the low-level encore/decode,
>>> but is otherwise pretty simple.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> index 9732908..4d8d5a8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>>  
>>>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>>>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>>> +#include <asm/virt.h>
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>>  
>>> @@ -35,24 +36,6 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
>>>  	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> -static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>>> -{
>>> -	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
>>> -		ctrl.enabled;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>> -				   struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl *ctrl)
>>> -{
>>> -	ctrl->enabled	= reg & 0x1;
>>> -	reg >>= 1;
>>> -	ctrl->privilege	= reg & 0x3;
>>> -	reg >>= 2;
>>> -	ctrl->type	= reg & 0x3;
>>> -	reg >>= 2;
>>> -	ctrl->len	= reg & 0xff;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  /* Breakpoint */
>>>  #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE	0
>>>  
>>> @@ -62,6 +45,7 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>>  #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
>>>  
>>>  /* Privilege Levels */
>>> +#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2	0
>>>  #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
>>>  #define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
>>>  
>>> @@ -76,6 +60,35 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_ACTIVE	1
>>>  #define ARM_KERNEL_STEP_SUSPEND	2
>>>  
>>> +#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
>>> +#define DBG_SSC_HYP		(3 << 14)
>>
>> Why do we need to touch the SSC field at all?
>>
>>> +
>>> +static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | ctrl.enabled;
>>> +
>>> +	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
>>> +		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP | DBG_SSC_HYP | (AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL2 << 1);
>>
>> I don't think this is correct. We want to allow, for example, a userspace
>> watchpoint to fire thanks to something like put_user, so the encoding
>> really needs to build up the PMC field (like we do already), then orr in
>> the HMC field.
> 
> Hmm, I got my arm and my arm64 mixed up here. For the latter, we don't
> actually support EL0+EL1 watchpoints, but I still think that the
> {HMC,SSC,PMC} encoding of {1,00,xx} is cleaner.

Indeed. So with that in mind, I ended up with the following patch, which is much simpler than the previous one:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index 9732908..115ea2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/virt.h>
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
@@ -35,10 +36,21 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
 };
 
+/* Privilege Levels */
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
+#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
+
+#define DBG_HMC_HYP		(1 << 13)
+
 static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
 {
-	return (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
+	u32 val = (ctrl.len << 5) | (ctrl.type << 3) | (ctrl.privilege << 1) |
 		ctrl.enabled;
+
+	if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() && ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1)
+		val |= DBG_HMC_HYP;
+
+	return val;
 }
 
 static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
@@ -61,10 +73,6 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_STORE	2
 #define AARCH64_ESR_ACCESS_MASK	(1 << 6)
 
-/* Privilege Levels */
-#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL1	1
-#define AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0	2
-
 /* Lengths */
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1	0x1
 #define ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2	0x3


Thanks,
	
	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-11 18:39 [PATCH v4 00/23] arm64: Virtualization Host Extension support Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] arm/arm64: KVM: Add hook for C-based stage2 init Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] arm64: KVM: Switch to " Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] arm/arm64: Add new is_kernel_in_hyp_mode predicate Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] arm64: Allow the arch timer to use the HYP timer Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN feature Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 16:10   ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 16:10     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] arm64: KVM: Skip HYP setup when already running in HYP Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Patch out use of HVC Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Patch out kern_hyp_va Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Introduce unified system register accessors Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Differenciate host/guest sysreg save/restore Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Split save/restore of registers shared between guest and host Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Use unified system register accessors Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Enable minimal sysreg save/restore Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Make __fpsimd_enabled VHE aware Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Implement VHE activate/deactivate_traps Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Use unified sysreg accessors for timer Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Add fpsimd enabling on guest access Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] arm64: KVM: VHE: Add alternative panic handling Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] arm64: KVM: Move most of the fault decoding to C Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] arm64: perf: Count EL2 events if the kernel is running in HYP Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 17:22   ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 17:22     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 17:22     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 18:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 18:23       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 18:27       ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 18:27         ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 18:27         ` Will Deacon
2016-02-11 18:40 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if " Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 10:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-15 10:22     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-15 17:46   ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 17:46     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 19:07     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 19:07       ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 19:07       ` Will Deacon
2016-02-16  9:55       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2016-02-16  9:55         ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-16  9:55         ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-17 17:57   ` [PATCH v4.1] arm64: perf: Count EL2 events if the kernel is " Marc Zyngier
2016-02-17 17:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-19 14:30     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-19 14:30       ` Will Deacon
2016-02-19 14:30       ` Will Deacon
2016-02-11 18:40 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] arm64: VHE: Add support for running Linux in EL2 mode Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-17 17:58   ` [PATCH v4.1] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Allow EL2 breakpoints if running in HYP Marc Zyngier
2016-02-17 17:58     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-17 17:58     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-19 14:30     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-19 14:30       ` Will Deacon
2016-02-19 14:30       ` Will Deacon
2016-02-11 18:40 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] arm64: Panic when VHE and non VHE CPUs coexist Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 18:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 17:26   ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 17:26     ` Will Deacon
2016-02-15 18:14     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 18:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 18:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 19:07 ` [PATCH v4 00/23] arm64: Virtualization Host Extension support Christoffer Dall
2016-02-11 19:07   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-11 19:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 19:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-11 19:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 10:23     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-15 10:23       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-15 10:34       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 10:34         ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-15 10:34         ` Marc Zyngier
2016-02-29 17:43 ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-29 17:43   ` Alex Bennée
2016-02-29 17:43   ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C2F21D.90205@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.