All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Move syscon reboot/poweroff to common dtsi for Exynos
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:58:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C32AFC.6030905@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C25982.4020301@samsung.com>

Hello Krzysztof,

On 02/15/2016 08:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>
>>> In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level.
>>> Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc",
>>
>> Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node
>> and that's why I made it top level in the DTSI.
>>
>>> some not. Anyway I think we should move to "soc" version.
>>>
>>
>> Not sure I'm following, did you mean to do it as a follow up or
>> to add a soc node for the missing DTSI as a part of this series?
>
> I meant to send a v2 with this under "soc" node even though on some DTS
> we do not have the "soc". Optional follow up would be to make DTS
> consistent and move nodes under "soc"... but that would be also a lot of
> churn.
>

Thanks for the clarification. I'll post a v2 then moving under a soc node.
  
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Move syscon reboot/poweroff to common dtsi for Exynos
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:58:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C32AFC.6030905@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C25982.4020301@samsung.com>

Hello Krzysztof,

On 02/15/2016 08:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>
>>> In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level.
>>> Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc",
>>
>> Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node
>> and that's why I made it top level in the DTSI.
>>
>>> some not. Anyway I think we should move to "soc" version.
>>>
>>
>> Not sure I'm following, did you mean to do it as a follow up or
>> to add a soc node for the missing DTSI as a part of this series?
>
> I meant to send a v2 with this under "soc" node even though on some DTS
> we do not have the "soc". Optional follow up would be to make DTS
> consistent and move nodes under "soc"... but that would be also a lot of
> churn.
>

Thanks for the clarification. I'll post a v2 then moving under a soc node.
  
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-09 18:30 [PATCH] ARM: dts: Move syscon reboot/poweroff to common dtsi for Exynos Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-02-09 18:30 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-02-10 14:53 ` Alim Akhtar
2016-02-10 14:53   ` Alim Akhtar
2016-02-14  6:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-14  6:44   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-15 13:38   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-02-15 13:38     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-02-15 23:04     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-15 23:04       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-02-16 13:58       ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2016-02-16 13:58         ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C32AFC.6030905@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.